Nomad_Scry

joined 2 years ago
[–] Nomad_Scry@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago

And they'd be mad about inheriting my poor vision.

[–] Nomad_Scry@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's it, exactly. After weeks of trying to get a (former) friend to agree that the killing of Tamir Rice was unjustified murder, he finally admitted that killing a child playing in a park was a bad thing.

The very next day he was back on his Back The Blue/Superpredators bullshit. It was flabbergasting.

[–] Nomad_Scry@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 5 months ago

Absolutely. The current copyright system is terrible but an AI replacement of creators is worse.

[–] Nomad_Scry@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 5 months ago (6 children)

If they can just steal a creator's work, how do they suppose creators will be able to afford continuing to be creators?

Right. They think we have enough original works that the machines can just make any new creations.

😠

[–] Nomad_Scry@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago

I don't really read so much as skim, skipping the filler words. So, what I read is "Did you notice second title post?"

I'm don't recommend reading this way because I miss important details frequently.

[–] Nomad_Scry@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 6 months ago

You sound like Hillary Clinton talking about being pragmatic (while completely missing the point.) Like people who complain about protesters blocking roads because it inconveniences their commute. Maybe that's your intent or maybe you don't understand that civility can be a form of oppression?

[–] Nomad_Scry@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 7 months ago

Not even caffeine?