- This means that if we find a cure for contagious diseases then fucking dead animals becomes okay
- "Shared moral framework" sounds like a fancy word with no actual logical backing behind it
- How do we decide which deviant behaviour is acceptable and which is unacceptable
PlasmaSnake
One day we will have a peer to peer video sharing platform... One day...
They should have shot the car until it stopped driving at them smh
I suppose we should go back and check then
The last 2 are the same to me lol
I didn't know liking AI was political
If you are attracted to drawings of children but not real children, I would say that this isn't pedophilia, since pedophilia is an attraction to actual children and not fictional ones
I'm more interested in whether the DSM includes fictional children in the diagnosis, or if the children must be real
I disagree. A lolicon can also be defined as a person into lolicon, with no interest in actual children. Since she's holding a lolicon manga, this would be a valid interpretation. Whether it would be a more correct translation, I don't know
- Super Mario 64 - Need a platformer and great for speedrunning
- STALKER Anomaly - Best shooter, dynamic gameplay, horror elements
- Falcon BMS - Deepest combat flight sim with dynamic campaigns
- IL2 1946 - Same but WW2
- Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 - Because you need a game where you can explore the world, plus VR
- Dwarf Fortress - Deepest RPG + colony sim
- rFactor 2 - Deepest racing sim and mods support all F1 seasons
- Morrowind - Another RPG but also great moddability and VR
- Lucas Chess - Deepest board game
- Minecraft - For randomly generated worlds, sandbox world, mods, and VR support
Stuff I had to leave out:
- Majora's Mask - Nostalgic RPG and good for speedrunning
- Civ 4 - Good strategy game but beaten by chess
- Paradox games - Same as Civ 4
- DCS - Falcon BMS beats it because of the dynamic campaign
- Medieval 2 Total War - The best Total War
The game does give you weapons though, mostly for the robot dudes if I remember correctly
It doesn't assume that there is no source of absolute morality. It says that religious people are incorrect to derive their absolute source of mortality from a deity, whether it exists or not
I prefer to frame the argument like this:
"If you found out your God didn't exist, would you go around killing people? Why not?"