They'd probably melt it down instead, just to avoid giving it back.
RobotToaster
joined 2 years ago
I'll add that every other self driving car company has a pretty good safety record, specifically because they do use LIDAR and RADAR so they can see better than humans.
Or a badly painted sign that says "Free charging"
That's just Ikea's new rapid disassembly tool, ësplöddën
Another way to help: If you have an idea that someone could possibly patent, no matter how stupid you think it is, you can publish a defensive technical disclosure on tdcommons for free https://www.tdcommons.org/
Octopodes no longer die when they give birth, meaning they can teach their young and form societies.
To give you an actual answer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_threat
The true threat doctrine was established in the 1969 Supreme Court case Watts v. United States.[3] In that case, an eighteen-year-old male was convicted in a Washington, D.C. District Court for violating a statute prohibiting persons from knowingly and willfully making threats to harm or kill the President of the United States.[3]
The conviction was based on a statement made by Watts, in which he said, "[i]f they ever make me carry a rifle the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J."[3] Watts appealed, leading to the Supreme Court finding the statute constitutional on its face, but reversing the conviction of Watts.
In reviewing the lower court's analysis of the case, the Court noted that "a threat must be distinguished from what is constitutionally protected speech."[3] The Court recognized that "uninhibited, robust, and wide open" political debate can at times be characterized by "vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." In light of the context of Watts' statement - and the laughter that it received from the crowd - the Court found that it was more "a kind of very crude offensive method of stating a political opposition to the President" than a "true threat."[3]
Most open source projects rely on volunteers, and few technical writers volunteer.
Or that he's an "influencer".
Doesn't instagram claim messages are e2e encrypted? How can this work without them having access to all messages?
This is only going to get easier. The djinn is out of the bottle.
If an AI is detecting bugs, the least it could do is file a pull request, these things are supposed to be master coders right? 🙃