Samsuma

😉

No it doesn't provide context for what you specifically pointed out. Which countries are we talking about that cover all these aspects that "lemmy communists" are defending?

Provide context and examples of these "lemmy communists" defending imperialism, supporting capitalistic exploitation of foreign labor and opposing anyone arming themselves in opposition to said imperialism (should go without saying but without naming names of course). Which countries doing these things did you have in mind that "lemmy communists" are supporting?

uncritical support for your lukewarm news/agitprop posting, please keep riling up libs who get upset at the sight of tass and RT

All 7 or 8 types of it.

I prefer cooking meals over food delivery and I don't think it's fair to scoff at those who do the latter. Time constraints and exhaustion-from-a-9-to-5 and all that.

I decided to work on a cookbook not too long ago that specifically attempts to address this, one which is focused on spending as MINIMAL time on cooking as possible whilst being somewhat "affordable" and "easy to remember", if that makes sense...

The Western Liberal, try as they might, will attempt to convince everyone that they and the Left are one and the same and that they are distinguished from the "Conservatives". You can already see this in this very thread lol..

It's really as simple as:

• Liberals and conservatives are in fundamental agreement with each other (both believe in free-market principles, both support the superexploitation of the Global South for resources, both are a-okay with setting up settler-colonies from time to time to ease economic tensions at the cost of Indigenous land and lives).
• Liberals will appropriate Leftist talking points (even if they have no need to when under the protection of capitalist interests) to blurry the lines between liberalism and leftism, so as to neuter revolutionary fervor (the end results of this are color revolutions, welfare capitalism, socdem poison, etc..). Conservatives don't even bother with the charades.
• Conservatism, libertarianism, etc.. are a subset of liberalism.
• Death to AmeriKKKa, the Euroanglo-Zionazi Entity and the KKKommonwealth.

It's regrettable to say the least when this happens, arguably one of their biggest (if not THE biggest) blindspot... Doesn't help their case that they're the biggest exporter to the Euroanglo-Zionazi settler-colony..

The "critical" in critical support stays critical for a reason.

Fair... I guess a better question is: Why did he want to resign in the first place? Try as I might from avoiding Nazilib misinformation from search results, I found this in the ProleWiki:

https://socialistmlmusings.wordpress.com/2017/02/23/stalins-four-attempts-at-resignation/

but nothing seems cut-clear about his motivation to quit... There's this baller quote though:

What could I do? Desert my post? That is not in my nature; I have never deserted any post, and I have no right to do so, for that would be desertion. As I have already said before, I am not a free agent, and when the Party imposes an obligation upon me, I must obey.

pretty much Western chauvinism for ya. Out of curiosity, why'd they kept rejecting his resignation requests? Couldn't find this info by searching..

Exactly this. Liberalism having a stranglehold on academia is a major part of the reason why people end up with the conclusions from the top panel.

Huh, and wdym by that? What was the idea you tried to share that got you censored?