SeekPie

Like if you produce bottled water, and you lower the quality of it (like, idk maybe theres stuff floating inside) so its cheaper to make, people will notice and switch to an alternative. And when the alternative tries something similar, they'll switch back to you.

So now you have 2 companies selling bottled water with stuff floating in it.

the things you listed are most certainly not a requirement.

Then what are? Why wouldn't the ability to maintain/repair, modify or resell be requirements for ownership?

If "ownership" doesn't have a unified meaning, then I can interpret "ownership" as the ability to maintain/repair, modify or resell the bought item.

You were arguing that having control over something (as in "being able to maintain/repair, modify or even resell" it) isn't a requirement for the thing's ownership?

Then what does "ownership" entail? Being allowed to use the thing but not modify or repair it? I'd argue that this isn't what "ownership" means.

We should make a shame/do not trust list.

Something like this?

https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/wiki/

So what does "ownership" mean then for software?

How would you power them without a battery? It doesn't matter if it's really power efficient if it isn't getting any power.

But no small or translucent batteries

I was under the impression that the company owner pays for insurance?

Insurance can (and probably will) increase prices if they're more likely to be vandalized.

What issues? And does Linux have more issues than Windows or different ones?

Often Windows has more issues, people have just gotten used to dealing with them.

You mean Vivaldi?

I hope he eats the wrong mushroom and shits his insides out on live TV.