It's OK the secretary of education was only promoting steak sauce in the classrooms.
TheFogan
joined 2 years ago
I mean I'd say off the bat there's so much more complicated than "it succeeded" or "it failed".
Every system ever made can fail, with issues completely unrelated to the system.
Ignoring the government, would we call a developing nation implimenting a new system, before getting attacked by a massively stronger country with a different (or even the same system), a failure of the system.
Or getting destroyed by a natural disaster... or millions of other factors.
Secondly, just fucking horrible ideas within them. I have to give Lycenko huge parts of the economic woe's of the soviet union. Likewise right now in capitalist America we can see RFK Jr's health system and Trumps tarriff system as likely to wreck the shit of the USA.
I would be mad, but, I'd also say go. Honestly when I was about 19, my mom more or less did this, in short she spent weeks talking up a hair dresser friend at church, commented that she played D&D, Eventually arranged for me to join her, and get a hair cut.
I talked with her, didn't really go anywhere, From my understanding the girl afterwards kind of responded to my mom something along the lines of "I know you are hoping I'd be your son's future wife but that's not where I am in life right now", and all the embarassment went on my mom for that.
So yeah, if you ask me, give it a shot, if it sucks, you've got solid standing to tell your dad not to do that shit again, if it's good, maybe something good can come from it.
Though to my understanding, it is from them... to my knowledge if a shop gets broken into, in their territory you don't call them, they already are aware and hunting down the perpetrators. Kind of what gang wars are... one gang basically declares an area their territory, if another gang takes action in that area they are basically declaring a gang war.
Obviously gangs know it's bad for business if they want to collect protection money, and they aren't overwhelmingly the biggest thing to be afraid of.
This is basically saying too much suffering is bad (succumbing to hunger). But a little (harsh breakup) can be good.
Not quite, first off scale isn't quite as relevant there, beyond a certain point can leave no room for revocation.
Hypothetically a brain tumor can cause suffering, but the removal might rewire your brain so you feel better.
Stepping on a lego may hurt... and most likely nothing of worth is gained from it.
Suffering is always bad... the events afterwards can go either way. Even say the harsh breakup, might lead to personal growth, might lead to a long depression spiral that ends in murder or suicide.
Also more important to point out, suffering isn't required for personal growth. Maybe someone becomes a better person by going to therapy, or just watching someone be kind to someone else and being inspired, or falling in love with someone that loves them back.
Suffering is one of many potential change agents per say. That change can be positive or negative, and again there are millions of change agents in the world. Suffering by definition is an unpleasant agent of change.
Suffering isn't good, but good can come from suffering, but certainly doesn't always.
A harsh breakup can lead to personal growth.
A loss of a job could lead to a better job and possibly better money management strategies.
But a kid born into abject poverty in an undeveloped villiage, spends his whole life scraping by in suffering always hungry until succumbing to a slow painful death -- no good, no meaning.
Mostly the idea that suffering is good is more common in religious ideologies that need an excuse to explain why their powerful god doesn't step in and fix things.
Much like the wilheim scream, it's a popular stock sound effect. It's in the intro of diddy kong racing, but it's in all kinds of movies like Mulan, Monsters inc 2, Taken, the simpsons movie, Xmen 2, Gladiator. hot fuzz, the bourne identity, five nights at freddys, wrath of the titan, resident evil the final chapter just to name a few.
actual stock sounds library it's just called giggling 2 children https://soundideas.sourceaudio.com/track/11473800
Diddy kong racing isn't it's origin, (it was used in Pocahontas 2 years prior to Diddy Kong racings release at a minimum), I think that's where it became the most obvious though, because if you played Diddy Kong Racing, you heard that sound effect every time you started up the game, which makes recognizing it everywhere else really common.
Also the diddy laugh will haunt you endlessly once you recognize it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8CArkcAuLE
(nickname comes from it's presence in the diddy kong racing start... but it's in so many movies and shows once you are keyed in to listen for it).
have to agree on that, there's the variation, it's faster if you take it's code verbatim, run it, and debug where there's obvious problems... but then you are vulnerable to unobvious problems, when a hacky way of doing it is weak to certain edge cases... and no real way to do it.
Reading it's code, understanding it, finding the problems from the core, sounds as time consuming as writing the code.
Build a party... the US has quite a few systems designed to make it impossible to build a party.
Take over a party and shift it's goals... that we've seen at least partially with the tea party, though admitted it was a pretty small shift, and in the wrong direction.
why on earth is bernie the focus, over half of congress is shit republicans that explicitly are pushing nothing but horrible things. I'd say that 10% of democrats are outright undercover republicans (fetterman, Senima, formerly manchin), over half of the remaining democrats are corporatists at best (IE the pelosi, schumer etc...).
Bernie is clearly miles ahead of at least 95% of congress. The fact that he can't start a political party by himself is, far from surprising. That's a bit like asking, Asking bernie to start a political party, when in short all he is is one of the best congressmen we have, is a bit like asking a really good pastry baker "why haven't you started a great multinational chain of Sushi restraunts".
I think the better question is, why can't wireless charging be more universal. We had decades of 500 different competing phone chargers. (as the famous XKCD comic https://xkcd.com/927/ ) mocks.
yet we don't seem to be getting anywhere near the idea of a universal wireless charge system.
Cases where you want something googled quickly to get an answer, and it's low consequence when the answer is wrong.
IE, say a bar arguement over whether that guy was in that movie. Or you need a customer service agent, but don't actually care about your customers and don't want to pay someone, or your coding a feature for windows.