Wolf314159

My related hot take: If I'm going to be subjected to Ads, I'd actually prefer to see relevant Ads (generally demographically, geographically, etc. while retaining some anonymity) than ads for products and services I'm never going to care about.

Semi-related, on my language learning journey I've discovered that as I watch more things in the language I'm learning via YouTube, Netflix, and other ad supported streaming services I see more and more ads in the language I'm trying to learn. And surprisingly (even to myself) I genuinely enjoy these ads because the language is usually simple and without much idiomatic use, it's all clearly enunciated, and it's directly related to the action on screen. Of course, everyone else in my household is now also getting those kinds of ads and I can't help but be amused.

Ads in real life spaces though? Unless it's telling me about some specific local thing or place, it is just ugly clutter on the scenery and architecture.

Top 10 most dangerous jobs in the U.S. according to Forbes:

1. Logging Workers
2. Fishing and Hunting Workers
3. Roofers
4. Aircraft Pilots and Flight Engineers
5. Structural Iron and Steel Workers
6. Delivery and Truck Drivers
7. Refuse and Recyclable Material Collectors
8. Underground Mining Machine Operators
9. Construction Trade Workers
10. Electrical Power-line Installers and Repairers

I'm know I'm preaching to the choir here, but it's good info to be familiar with when some knuckle dragging MAGA hat pretends to be patriotic.

Notice that law enforcement overseers and military are not on this list. Moreover, LEOs often get paid MUCH better than many of the people employed at some of the jobs listed above. It's also a pretty safe bet these days that if an American police officer is in a dangerous situation, they are the danger. I'm all for respecting people that choose dangerous careers, but police and veterans are not heros for making that choice any more than any of the others on this list.

OSHA has a similar list, no police either.

USA Today has a top 25 list, still no police.

Could they not think of an original name? Calling it YouTube-dl is just unnecessarily lazy and confusing. This appears to be mostly a docker image of yt-dlp, which is itself a fork of youtube-dl.

For normal albums: Artist/Year - Album [release ID if necessary for ambiguity for various versions of an album]/Disc-track - title.extension . Compilations (soundtracks, promo mixes from shows, etc.) get "Various Artist" as the album artist and sorted under "Various Artists" of the top level of my albums directory. Stuff from other sources would sometimes get their own special directory at the top level outside "albums".

Tags are everything, that's where the in-depth data is. album folders hold extra art, inserts, metadata, etc.

I don't really make manual playlists using relatively pathed m3u anymore because support is inconsistent across the apps I've used to listen to my library. These days Plex, jellyfin, ncmpcpp (tui front-end for mpd) all handle their own playlists. Those are mostly just spontaneous groupings or automated shuffles I don't really keep track of.

Back in the day I made mixtapes on actual cassettes, recorded from the radio, my CDs, and later tracks I found on Napster and soulseek. Later I moved on to making tons of playlists in foobar2000. Some of those playlists probably still litter my hard drive (now dead text because the files having long since been reorganized and moved). For the really good tight playlists I made of that era, I'd make physical mix CDs that I would master with sound forge. Had a few people that would trade these around. Make a mix, master, make many copies, distribute. Those CDs often died in cars and turned into coasters, so I'd keep the bin and cue files of the masters to make replacements. Those tracks would ultimately get turned back into mp3 or flac depending on quality and tagged with my own title, cover art, etc. and get filed away in the Various Artist folder. Then I got an mp3 player and it's been either full album listening or dynamic playlists for me ever since.

I still make yearly playlists in Spotify as I discover new stuff or rediscover old stuff, like a musical diary. Those playlists inspire library additions via the artist directly, Bandcamp flac files, or other means.

These are also pretty good at shielding you from biting insects and fascist police state spy cameras.

It's got the juice!

Projecting much? I don't see any of that shit in OP's photo. Maybe talk to your therapist about why a children's toy triggers such intrusive homoerotic and beastial thoughts in yourself. This is not a healthy reaction to a child's toy.

1. You're bad a being a troll.
2. Googling it doesn't actually produce an answer that makes any fucking sense of this "joke".
3. Same energy as those idiots that answer "I don't know" when Amazon asks them to help review a product.

Why immediately shame the guys choosing the unicorn as the weird guys? And add in a little homophobia to boot? That is exactly the problem with defining gender stereotypes based on sex at birth. There is absolutely nothing wrong with a boy wanting to dig a terrifying and deadly fae creature with a fucking sword on its face from the heart of a dead giant. There is also nothing wrong with a boy wanting to dig a majestic pony from out of a pink heart shaped cocoon.

You're the one perverting this into something about grown men having fantasies about fucking horses. We all know bronies exist and their tastes may not be for everyone, but that's a poor excuse for this brand of cringe hate mongering.

Well, it seems that every time a search engine's AI gives me a definitive and wordy "answer" to a question I search and provides a helpful citation of the page from which it got that answer, it is ALWAYS just a completely hallucinated answer that the cited page in no way supports. This isn't just hyperbole, this has been my experience with every single search engine AI summary

And I find myself having to go back and fix the autocorrect that my phone keyboard "helpfully" makes with increasing frequency. It used to be that autocorrect would just fix a typo when I'd obviously typed gibberish because I missed a key. But now, it is regularly replacing entire words that I've typed completely correctly with some other word that makes absolutely no sense.

I'm all for some specific uses of AI. Things like speech to text or images to text? Sure that's a great use. But when it comes to research, writing, or spreadsheets, AI tools just need to shut up and stay the fuck out of my way. I'm becoming convinced a little more everyday that anyone using AI to summarize articles or search results is a complete moron and shouldn't be trusted.

Calling a Ruby Tuesday's a restaurant is kind of like me calling myself a carpenter because I've assembled a few pieces of Ikea furniture. It's basically sit down fast food with a liquor license.