I'm not sure what bubble you live in, but not everybody can be a Bay Area nepo baby like you, and not being one doesn't make them less correct.
XLE
According to the articles I read, sure doesn't seem like it. ironic, I know. The articles we're getting are made by journalists who are listening and writing down what they see.
I'm aware of authoritarian regimes that block internet based on the class of people that are accessing it, thanks. China already does this.
But I don't see how you're drawing the conclusion that this portal is going to be the vessel for doing that. Seems too 1984esque even for Trump, and like it would require actual competence.
lol you missed the duplicate the first time, yet another sign of your illiteracy. And you ignored it, typical of the belligerent hypocrite... But tell us, o wise one, what "authority" do you feel was appealed to?
Is it a coincidence that X is also the epicenter of corporate-funded CSAM generation?
(BTW the byline on this post, "Facebook, Instagram and YouTube being no better", is not backed by the Gizmodo article)
It's most indicative of the fact that so-called "guardrails" baked into chatbots don't really work. Any unvetted information ingested by a chatbot may be regurgitated by a chatbot, no matter how much the alleged tech geniuses working at allegedly cutting-edge companies do about it.
I'm not sure I follow your logic. If countries are getting more authoritarian and nationalistic, and China is already blocking Tor, why would they feel compelled to not block something that even more blatantly a nationalistic American project?
The United States already funds the Tor Project, but despite this looking similar at first blush, it's far more centralized and thus easier to surveil anybody who uses it.
Portal team includes former DOGE member Coristine
Aka Edward Coristine, aka "Big Balls", aka the guy who helped compromise your social security number, aka the reason the US put stormtroopers into DC.
Wrong.
Even if you think you are right, o arbiter of truth, apparently dozens of people disagree with your take when shown context. That's on you bro. Go fix it.
And that's bad for the harm it will cause to people who are bound to be in a poorer locale, right Facedeer?
....Right?
Wrong, I called you wrong already, you weird liar.
Your fault, even if I assume you might be right.
Genuinely, are you mentally well? I asked you what authority you think I'm appealing to. Am I speaking to a person or an LLM?