aleq

joined 2 years ago
[–] aleq@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I'm not 100% sure about the economics of tariffs, but my interpretation is that the US are shooting themselves in the foot more than us. And if we can project an image of a stable level-headed trading partner and create good trade relations with India, China and countries in Africa and South America that might be more valuable in the long run than our US trade relations.

Basically, if US wants to hamper their own economy, let them. Meanwhile we'll be Open For Business™ and picking up all the good stuff they left behind.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

While I do think the EU is lacking the balls to do this, there's also some strategy to consider here. It certainly would be lovely if the EU would be more defensive, but also more damaging to the EU economy (at least in the short run, probably for a long time).

China is being painted as enemy number one, and there's long-standing beef between the countries. Trump lost or is losing the trade war, and needs to make himself not look weak. Meanwhile China wants to project strength internally. Whatever is happening between closed doors, China has everything to gain from humiliating the US at this point. Trumps incompetence is already evident, they just need to fuel the flames.

With the EU, the situation is wildly different. EU doesn't really want to project power, they want to project exactly as much power as is necessary not to seem weak but no more. It wants to show that it's a level-headed free trade partner ready to take the lead in the free world, the fairest and most stable market in the world.

...that's my take on it anyway. USE! USE! USE! USE! 🇪🇺

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

So based. Any chance that they'll win?

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

What does unofficial recognition mean? Can a country do anything unofficially?

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (4 children)

TFW Chinese EV makers aren't even competing with western ones anymore, only among themselves.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I guess MAGA people will see this as a win? Since imports are down 2x much as imports. If the value of the goods in these containers are roughly equal, that should mean smaller trade deficits?

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What? Having Chrome become Chromium and Android being degooglified would be pretty huge?

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry, I realise this is half-joking and not at all the point of your post, but I find it interesting...

Otoh, I really don't want to learn chinese, meh

It's unlikely to become the lingua franca over night, especially since Chinese already speak English (well, the ones you're likely to come in contact with). Maybe your grand-children will learn it in school though.

Apart from the characters and pronunciation, the latter of which is probably quite easy if taught at an early age, Chinese is quite straightforward. There's no regular vs irregular verbs because there are no inflections at all - no cases, no tenses, no plural forms. Just plop the words down in the right order and you're done. And as a second language, I guess we would only use pinyin until quite late in school.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

If a tariff falls on a product category but no one is around to hear it, did it even make a sound?

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

day before yesterday, 105. yesterday 125. today 145.

so I guess 165 tomorrow?

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe he's doing it to displease someone...

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Automating this system with some kind of algorithm is not right, but a nearly blind 70-year-old can still do damage? The angle here is weird.

view more: next ›