.
aramis87
joined 2 years ago
Wiping out? Like, entirely? Well, personal physical assault isn't wise, so let's take that off the table first. I wouldn't suggest basic firearms, either: they'd likely just dent it or fly off and hurt something else.
Running it over isn't likely to damage it too badly, and trying to drown it just leads to rust. I think it'd be hard to get an "accidental" fire to have a high-enough heat sustained for a long enough to kill it. Dropping it from a height might bend or dent it.
Honestly, I think your best chance would be some kind of high explosive. Not a dinky thing like a hand grenade - aside from being under-powered, there's the extra shrapnel to worry about. Maybe some dynamite or C4, with a long enough detcord so you're not near the explosion. Of course, that'll likely just launch it upwards a bit, so you'd want to enclose it in something that ensures most of the damage is directed to the pan and not dispersed around the edges.
Maybe ask the police to do a demolition demonstration with their little self-contained units that they blow things up in, would that be feasible? How much do you hate this pan, anyway?
Why do they think Moscow is flying people from Libya to Russia so they can send them as asylum seekers into Europe? Wouldn't it make more sense for Moscow to fly people from Libya to Russia and then send them to the front lines against Ukraine?
Okay, cool. Hey, I'm now taking bets on how long until someone uses the ads to inject malware into a car or truck ...
Take over the land, wants no responsibility for the people and will murder them all for that reason.
Bridge could count toward NATO spending target
The project could provide a boost to Italy’s commitment to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP targeted by NATO, as the government has indicated it would classify the bridge as defense-related, helping it to meet a 1.5% security component. Italy argues that the bridge would form a strategic corridor for rapid troop movements and equipment deployment to NATO’s southern flanks, qualifying it as a “security-enhancing infrastructure.”
A group of more than 600 professors and researchers signed a letter earlier this summer opposing the military classification, noting that such a move would require additional assessments to see if it could withstand military use.
It's your employer's responsibility to ensure that they have sufficient people trained (or at least their responsibilities documented) so that someone else can pick up the slack during vacations, illnesses, accidents, family responsibilities, etc. If your employer hasn't been doing that, that's their problem, not yours.
During your final two weeks, your employer should be asking you to help train your replacement, or at least document your job to help your replacement. Plus there's an additional two weeks for your coworker to help train your replacement after you leave. Four weeks of training should be more than sufficient to get your replacement comfortable enough to handle everyday tasks, and they can bring anything they need help with to your manager.
This situation isn't your problem to solve.
Uh, kinda, maybe? Most use cases are things that I don't really see the use of, or have found to produce more flawed results than previous ways of doing things.
However, a couple years ago, someone on reddit said their perfect use case was using AI to hunt down things you enjoyed but have forgotten the titles of - books, movies, tv series, songs, videogames, etc.
Well, I have a few of those half-forgotten items, where I've remembered snippets of things but have no idea what they actually were called. I've tried looking them up over the years with regular search engines, with no luck. And a few times in the past couple years, I've used random AI engines to try to track these titles down.
And the thing is, AI absolutely has not been able to tell me what the titles to anything was. However, in trying to come up with more details to pass to AI, I've accidentally found other webpages that helped me find what I was looking for. Like, one of the things I was looking for was a horribly bad 1970's tv movie and, in my latest search for the title, on like page 8 of my google/duckduckgo results trying to find something to feed the AI from what little I remembered, I ran across a website that lists the cast and plot of, like, every tv movie. Not just top ten, or people that became big stars later, or horror movies or whatever, but every movie from like the 50s /60s on. And I sat on that website and read through the high-level plotline of every tv movie from, like 1968 on, and eventually found the movie.
There was a book where I remembered the first name of the main character and a very specific scene, even some of the exact words, and the three AI engines I tried couldn't tell me anything. But in searching for more details (and I had tried serving for it before), I eventually ran across a book site that helped me out. Interesting thing: when I passed direct quotes to AI, they couldn't tell me, when I asked what books had that plot, they couldn't tell me, but if I asked if a specific scene happened in the book, they said it was there.
I have one game that I'm still searching for, but AI engines have inadvertently helped me find most of the rest of my wishlist.
So, I went and googled "Trump cheats at golf" stories from 2010-2020, and these are clips from the first three results that turned up - and there were a LOT of results!
Trump hit a ball into the lake. But when the other players weren't looking, he got out another ball and hit another try, although that too went into the lake. “So he drives up,” Faxon said, “and drops where he should’ve dropped the first time and hits it on the green.” [....]
Tirico remembers hitting one of the best shots of his life squarely onto the green, but when he walked over, the ball was 50 feet away in a bunker. “Trump’s caddy came up to me and said, ‘You know that shot you hit on the par 5?’” Tirico says. “‘It was about 10 feet from the hole. Trump threw it in the bunker. I watched him do it.’”
He throws it, boots it, and moves it. He lies about his lies. He fudges and foozles and fluffs. At Winged Foot, where Trump is a member, the caddies got so used to seeing him kick his ball back onto the fairway they came up with a nickname for him: “Pele.”
Trump said, “So, where does everybody stand here?" [Trump then claimed he was at] “Four for a three.” Faxon had to laugh because Trump was actually putting for a seven, but he was claiming it was for a four,
They call him on it, but he just shrugs and cheats some more. It’s ruined his reputation in the golf world. Ninety percent of the people I interviewed — on and off the record — say he openly cheats.
he was right of the green but a little bit down the hill. He didn’t think anybody was watching, but I was. I saw him make a chipping motion from the side of the hill but no ball came up. Then he walked up the hill, stuck his hand in the hole and pulled a ball out. It must’ve been a ball he had in his hand the whole time.
He makes sure to hit first off every tee box and then jumps in the cart, so he’s halfway down the fairway before the other three are done driving. That way he can get up there quick and mess with his ball. So this one time — we were on the 18th — he hits first, kind of blocks it right, and jumps in his cart and starts driving away. My guy pures one right down the middle. I mean, I SAW it go right down the middle. One of his best drives of the day. But by the time we get to my guy’s ball, it’s not there. We can’t find it anywhere. And Trump is now ON the green already putting! Where’s our ball? And then Trump starts yelling back at us, “Hey guys! I made a birdie!” He’s holding up his ball and celebrating. And that’s when we realized. He stole our ball!
Trump, his partner, came over and secretly knocked the ball on to a part of the green where Dunleavy could putt it. Dunleavy picked it up and put it back where it was. “That’s when Donald starts yelling to the other two,” Dunleavy recalls. “He goes, ‘Guys, guys! I wanna tell you how great a guy Coach is. I knocked his ball over here so he could have a putt at it. But then he put it back! And that’s why he’s an unemployed coach and I’m worth $13 billion.”
“He’d declared that the [Bedminster] club should start having senior club championships for those 50 and up, but he forgot that one of the best players at the club had just turned 50,” Reilly writes. “Having zero chance of beating the guy, he went up to his Trump Philadelphia course on the day of the tournament and played with a friend there. Afterward, according to a source inside the Bedminster club, he called the Bedminster pro shop and announced he’d shot 73 and should be declared the winner. The pro, wanting to stay employed, agreed. His name went up on the plaque.” This turned out to be a double con. When someone from the Bedminster club called up Trump’s caddy at the course in Philadelphia and asked what he’d shot there, the caddy replied, “Maybe 82. And that might be generous.”
well-known sportswriter, Michael Bamberger, reported that Trump won the 2018 club championship at his West Palm Beach club without playing in that tournament, either. And Trump admitted to Reilly that at least some of those eighteen club championships weren’t championships at all. “Whenever I open a new golf course, I play the official opening round and then I just call that the first club championship,” Reilly recounts Trump as saying. “There you go! I’m the first club champion!"
“If you’ll cheat to win at golf, is it that much further to cheat to win an election? To turn a Congressional vote? To stop an investigation? If you’ll lie about every aspect of the game, is that much further to lie about your taxes, your relationship with Russians, your groping of women?"
I read an article where he picked up the ball himself and moved it. After like the third time in the same game, one of the other golfers called him on it and he just denied it.
Sharks are about 450-400 million years old. They were around 200 million years before the dinosaurs, and have outlasted them by 65 million years. They're older than the North Star, the rings of Saturn, the Atlantic Ocean, and trees.
And it took 60 million years for the trees to start rotting when they died, because the bacteria to break them down didn't exist. Those trees died, fell over, became peat, and then eventually coal. The trees that were dead and buried trapped carbon dioxide that had been in the atmosphere. 90% of the coal we burn today comes from the period when trees didn't rot, and we're re-releasing all that CO2 back into the atmosphere, from where it's been safely sequestered for 250 million years.
Pols have been saying that, in various forms, since Reagan.