bearboiblake

joined 1 year ago
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I notice none of your links reference attacks against peacekeeper forces, which Israel does - all the time.

Hezbollah was founded by orphans whose parents were killed by the IDF in Israel's invasion of Lebanon. Hezbollah protects the people of Lebanon from genocide and ethnic cleansing. I will not argue that they haven't committed terrible crimes, I recognize that orphan children organizing a resistance effort against a nuclear power supported by the United States is likely to do things I disagree with, but as a harm reductionist, I would support Hezbollah over Israel. It isn't even close. Israel is a thousand times worse than Hezbollah.

Even Christians living in Lebanon have spoken favorably about Hezbollah, because Hezbollah protects the Lebanese people - regardless of faith or ethnicity - against the terrible crimes of Israel:

"How can we as Christians in this area not be with Hezbollah? They protect our churches," Rifaat Nasrallah, a 60-year-old quarryman from the village, told the Telegraph.

Israel is now conducting an ethnic cleansing campaign of Southern Lebanon and Hezbollah are bravely fighting those disgusting Zionist fascists and putting them down like the monsters they are.

If you want to see an end to Hezbollah and their crimes, look no further than the dissolution of the criminal, genocidal state of Israel.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Of course, it could never be Israel, the state conducting two genocides with a long and storied history of breaking ceasefires and firing on UN troops.

You cease, Israel fires.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 13 points 4 days ago

This is steel-manning an argument for a feature no one wants which is most likely the thin end of the wedge for increased surveillance and censorship.

This is just how it starts so they can trick well meaning developers into making websites and platforms which make use of this verification while it is still self-ID, but when the laws become more demanding and require connecting your user account to your real-world identity, it'll already be too late, all of your online activity can be tied back to you.

When I make this argument, people like to call it a slippery slope, but the fact is that there are so many nations cracking down on free, unmonitored access to the internet, with social media restrictions, platforms like Discord requiring you to provide identification, and so on.

All for this, all of that risk, all for a feature that adds very little value to the computing experience of anyone.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 105 points 6 days ago

This is why leftists and even liberals need to demand anti-zionist leaders. We do NOT want the far-right to be leading the fight against zionism.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He asked her what she thought about "men in womens sports" (which is obviously transphobic) and she was uncomfortable and said "I don't have an opinion on that" and Trump hated it. I think she was just a somewhat random lady tbh, but it was probably somewhat staged

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

This grandma had to take a job doing Doordash to pay for her husband's chemo treatment. didn't even make enough money to pay taxes. She made like $22k in a year.

Trump wasn't even going to tip her until a journalist asked about it and he was like "oh yeah" and handed her a $100 bill...

What a dysfunctional society we live in, all because we need to protect the freedom of billionaires and corporations to exploit us for profit.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you might be replying to the wrong user, though OP got instance banned, so I think they can't hear you anyways

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago

Understood, fair enough. You know what they say, scratch a liberal and all that.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Come on, now, be fair, I love dunking on liberals as much as the next leftist, but "Mexican men aren't chauvinists" is hardly a conservative position, as leftists aren't we supposed to make the argument that no people are a monolith?

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

oh, did you instance ban them from db0 or just anarchist.nexus? will they see my replies here still, and also be able to reply?

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thank you for your responses, I appreciate it. Glad to see we broadly agree!

I guess? Seems kinda vague, like yeah people will do what they can for their own self interest, but there are exceptions and limits I think.

Yes, people will do what they can for their own self interest, exactly. By exceptions and limits, what do you mean by that? Like, people have their own ethical boundaries?

Yeah, but I think change is possible, and even barring change, sometimes enough pressure can move them on certain issues.

I agree with that - "certain issues" being the operative phrase there. I believe that, as long as it does not conflict too strongly with the interests of the extremely wealthy, they are willing to move in progressive directions, or regressive directions, in response to pressures from the voter base and from influential special interest groups.

By the way, feel free to share your own beliefs and positions - or something else entirely - I don't want to dominate the direction or framing of this conversation, I just opened with this because I wasn't sure what else to open with.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Okay, wonderful! Thank you for sharing.

I'm gonna just go ahead and outline a few of my beliefs - but of course this is not an exhaustive list - and you can let me know what, if anything, you disagree with, and we can take it from there. I hope that sounds good to you.

I believe that, under capitalism, money is power.

I believe that the more money you have, the easier it is to make more money.

I believe that almost anyone with any power would be willing to use that power to benefit themselves.

I believe that both mainstream political parties in the US have been nearly completely captured by the extremely wealthy.

I believe that the mainstream media serve the interests of the extremely wealthy.

I believe that the extremely wealthy have an outsized influence over independent media and social media platforms.

I believe that the extremely wealthy generally prefer fascism to socialism, because socialism threatens their class interests (i.e. their ability to accumulate and hoard wealth, and therefore power)

What do you think? Do you agree or disagree with these positions?

 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/37198

More than 96,000 Cubans, including 11,000 children, are "waiting for surgery" due to a fuel shortage caused by the American blockade, the country's deputy foreign minister, Carlos Fernandez de Cossio, said on Sunday.

The numbers cited by the minister on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday were first reported earlier this month by Cuban Minister of Public Health José Ángel Portal Miranda, who explained that President Donald Trump's policy of “energy asphyxiation," using tariffs to threaten countries out of importing fuel to Cuba, has devastated its National Health Service.

The policy has left Cuba unable to import oil from abroad for more than three months, reducing its fuel supply by about 90% and leading to periodic blackouts and strict energy rationing.

Using the severely limited electricity at its disposal, Cuba's health system has been forced to prioritize continuing cancer treatments and other lifesaving procedures, putting those awaiting non-urgent surgeries on the sidelines.

Last month, a specialist at a hospital in Holguín told Diario de Cuba that the surgeries canceled included "uncomplicated hernias, cataract surgeries, some non-urgent gynecological procedures, and scheduled orthopedic surgeries."

Other healthcare professionals said that nobody was being admitted to the hospital for tests and that it was running low on basic supplies like syringes, IV tubing, and antibiotics, which could not be delivered due to fuel shortages. Most of those that have been used had to be donated by family members or purchased for exorbitant prices on the black market.

Jorge Barrera, a reporter for CBC News, spoke with patients and employees at Havana’s National Institute of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery this weekend and found it to be at about half capacity, and that nonessential care has been virtually all suspended.

"Even though the health system is a point of pride for Cuba... something that they export to the rest of the world," Barrera explained, "because of this crisis, because of the impact it's had on the skyrocketing prices, it's just not enough for them to make ends meet. So people are quitting... to find other ways to make money to feed their families."

Experts with the United Nations have condemned the blockade of Cuba as "a serious violation of international law." Condemnations have grown louder over the past week as Trump said he believed he'd have "the honor of taking Cuba" after it collapsed.

De Cossio said he hoped the people of the United States would ask "Why does our government treat the whole population of Cuba this way?" and that they'd "understand that it's not correct to treat another nation the way the US is doing simply to try to achieve political goals."

The US blockade of Cuba is largely unpopular with the American public. A poll published last week by YouGov found that just 28% of adult US citizens said they approved of the US blocking oil shipments to the country, while 46% said they opposed it.

Asked by anchor Kristen Welker about suggestions from Trump that Cuba would collapse "on its own" without the need for the US to intervene militarily, De Cossio retorted, "What does 'on its own' mean when it’s being forced by the United States?"

Prior to Trump's further measures to isolate Cuba in January, the US had placed Cuba under an economic embargo for more than 60 years, which severely hampered the country's economic development and has cost Cuba trillions of dollars since it began, according to the UN.

"It’s a very bizarre statement, and it’s claimed by most US politicians repeatedly that Cuba will collapse on its own," De Cossio said. "Then why does the US government need to employ so many resources, so much political capital, so many human resources to try to destroy the economy of another country? Evidently, it implies that the country does not have the characteristics to collapse on its own."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

 

I posted this meme to the Lemmy Shitpost community. I reckoned that it might generate a bit of debate, and would probably end up locked, but the entire post got deleted, and moreover, I'm now forbidden from sharing political posts to the community. Political posts are not against the rules of the community.

I have reason to believe that the post was deleted not because it was controversial, but because the moderator (Decoy321) disagreed with the political slant of the meme. The reason I find this suspicious is because other controversial posts, such as one about veganism remains up, and Decoy321 seemed to enjoy the fact it was controversial:

view more: next ›