bearboiblake

Your blind adherence to the status quo goes so far as to deny the existence of hydrogen tanks, for fucks sake.

I broadly agree with you, though I would add that there are exceptions e.g. for disabled people.

The reason I am being downvoted is 100% because progressive people are just as capable of being reactionary, short-sighted and propagandized as conservatives.

Look at the replies. People are denying basic facts, claiming that fuel cells don't exist and that hydrogen can't be contained. How do you even argue with people who are so blinded by adherence to their pre-existing beliefs?

I am 100% correct about hydrogen fuel cell based EVs and these people are so sensitive that they cannot cope with someone questioning the narrative fed to them by the mainstream.

Yes, for sure, a lot of the problems at hand are caused by the heirarchical structure of society. That's why I'm an anarchist, because in my experience only anarchism has an accurate diagnosis and coherent solution for the problems that plague our society.

You might be right, I've always considered my ear to be below average to be honest, but maybe I'm underestimating myself, or overestimating others

What is the distinction you're drawing between the Russian Federation and the US?

Honestly, I kinda don't believe it. I once was listening to music as background noise on YouTube, and the auto-play algorithm apparently put me on a video of AI-generated music. After around 10 minutes or so, something just felt off to me, the music felt really boring and lifeless, and so I alt-tabbed and discovered it was AI. I wasn't actively listening or even paying attention and my subconscious clocked it.

I would heavily doubt the reports you receive about the popularity or success of AI-generated art. There are very influential and powerful people and institutions heavily invested in it who have a very strong incentive to manufacture evidence and just outright lie about it to keep the bubble inflated, either because they're true believers in AI, or because they want to offload their investment to retail investors before the bubble pops

Honestly, I think the social implications of this are way, way worse than the privacy implications, which are also absolutely terrifying.

Please, can we burn down Silicon Valley, pleaaaase?

Who gives a shit about the fraud? Nobody actually enjoys listening to AI music and he defrauded Spotify. Good for him, frankly, shame he got caught. Obligatory fuck AI.

...there are literally fuel cell electric vehicles already in production...?

to tell you the truth, I think public transport is the real long term solution, I put fuel cells in there too because some individuals will need a car, e.g. disabled people, and I think it's a big improvement to ICE and battery-based EVs both in terms of environmental/social impact and safety

For those who don't know, this is just military dictatorship. A lie detector test can be made to say whatever the examiner wants it to say.

I absolutely would agree with that, and that is why I advocate for anarchism, which is the one and only ideology I have encountered which actually accounts for that fact.