I’m on my phone currently but probably the flag of the Spartacus League
blobii
My proof is the entire pamphlet ‘The Russian Revolution’. She always critiqued other socialist/communist ideologies as a friend, not a hater and her arguments were never not atleast somewhat dialectical.
Being used by others for something doesn’t constitute being that. I can understand why you’d think that though. Although she did discredit the bolsheviks, it was simple dialectics.
Rest in peace. Never a day where I don’t remember her sacrifice.
yeah, I get what you mean now and she was NOT ok with capitalism and was definitely a materialist from what I’ve read of her work.
She was around before the Soviet Union and mostly did Orthodox Marxist and Social-Democracy (classical/pre1920s not reformist or demsucc). Criticised reformism as well as the vanguard state but still acknowledged the need for revolution. Less of a western com revisionist than often Portrayed to be, more of a classical Marxist if anything. She was writing theory around the same time as Lenin so one isn’t really more revisionist than the other in a literal sense.
haven’t tried it but looks pretty based
Do you mean defederation as in a one-way mirror type thing where we see them but they can’t see us?
Economy is just “the state of a country or region in terms of the production and consumption of goods and services”
So no, it doesn’t have to be capitalist, it just has to facilitate the production and consumption of goods and services.
If a communist government distributes food among its citizens, that is facilitating the consumption of goods. That’s economy.
>‘Who compiled it?!!! This isn’t a legitimate source!!!’
>The CIA
…
Yeah Trotsky was still a Marxist, even if a revisionist