catloaf

joined 2 years ago
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fewer claims, less payout.

That's what I was responding to. The company is paying out the same regardless of however many people file a claim. If you meant something else, that was unclear.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, and? All diplomacy is political theater. That response is political theater.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

No. They will reach a dollar figure, and divide that amongst the claimants (and law firm). More claimants does not mean a higher settlement.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So does the US. But laws are only worth their enforcement.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 53 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I wouldn't say deserve, but I'm not surprised it happened.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

They MAY use the little baby SATA connectors. I'd check first.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

It is not legal. Some find ways to do it anyway.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If it's like the ones I've been to, it is not open to the public. You have to buy tickets and show ID. And you are restricted to certain areas.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They were in fact hermits in a case.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

A military facility is not an open venue.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No. Usually it's only demonstration aircraft like the Thunderbirds, Blue Angels, and the Golden Knights. And private pilot stunts. Sometimes they'll do operational fighter jets showing off, but what the article is talking about is the ones not in the show.

And it literally says "facilities" in the headline.

view more: ‹ prev next ›