Antitrust lawsuits and plausible deniability
communist
interesting, thank you.
It really is spotify's killer feature for me, probably won't switch to something that doesn't have it.
Spotify has a feature where if it is playing on another device, you can control it with any other device logged into the account, is there any good way to replicate this with a linux desktop and an android phone?
My point was that censorship is valid when it is to prevent harming individuals/fraud/bullying
my goalpost did not move at all.
you are being a hypocrite by saying it was okay not to have that on wikipedia because it was already banned
you should oppose that ban on the basis of censorship, no?
for the same reason they don't give resources to blatant harassment campaigns.
both are against the rules and both are censorship for nearly identical reasons
If I made a wikipedia page showing your social security and banking information would your stance hold true?
This is to stop a cyberbullying campaign against a disabled person
That kind of censorship doesn't sit will with me. What else are they keeping from us?
probably other things to harrass individuals with?
That's pathetic.
Well, that's a bad argument, this is all a guess on your part that is impossible to prove, you don't know how empathy or the human brain work, so you don't know it isn't computable, if you can explain these things in detail, enjoy your nobel prize. Until then what you're saying is baseless conjecture with pre-baked assumptions that the human brain is special.
conversely I can't prove that it is computable, sure, but you're asserting those feelings you have as facts.
Empathy is not illogical, behaving empathetically builds trust and confers longterm benefits.
also the notion that an ai must behave logically is not sound.
Tbh this is an incredibly easy fix, either cap the number of waters someone can order in software or have an override where a human takes over if an order is suspicious, there's not an infinite number of ways to fuck with this.