crispy_caesus

Why is the author sharing concern for the US' defensive capabilities "to threaten nuclear obliteration" (or something along these lines)?

I mean first of all they have a quantity of hundreds these, of which only a few of will essentially destroy our world as we know it.

But then also how is this even something to be seen negatively, in what way are capabilities of nuclear war something to be seen this desireable.

I like the idea of not letting stupid people spread misinformation on the internet (unless it's myself), but this is just gatekeeping the right to speak out in public about certain topics which I find deeply problematic.