damnedfurry

When Firefox started recording key strokes

Source? That's news to me, and when I tried finding a source myself, all I found were extensions etc. to add that to the browser.

EDIT: Both the comment I replied to, and a comment replying to me by the same person, have been deleted...were they caught in a lie/mistake and not brave enough to admit it? lol

I remember the joke that Microsoft called it that deliberately so that if people wrote "I hate ME" it wouldn't sound like they were trashing the OS.

You thought that because the headline is pretty deliberately misleading. Clickbait trash.

The article is clear the broken update effects a specific subset of enterprise users, on a specific mix of base versions and cumulative updates.

So you admit the headline is lying, then? The headline doesn't even try to use weasel words to say "some users", it just straight-up says that the update removes things, heavily implying both that it's a global change, and that it's deliberate.

The pricing model hasn’t changed.

Doesn't enshittification also entail the removal/reduction of previously-existing features/functionality?

LAMF lies in the 'victim's expectation not being met, with respect to who the thing they supported is happening to. What they support and what happened must match; the LAMF lies solely in the 'I assumed it (what was supported/done) wouldn't happen to me'.

I think even 'adjacent' is giving it too much credit.

After all, what's happened is the literal opposite of what they wanted, while LAMF requires that the thing you supported happening is what happens, you just thought it'd happen to others and not you.

That's not the number of people using Amazon, that's the number of people paying for a premium subscription service on top of their Amazon usage. No one, whether they buy things on Amazon or not, needs Prime.

That is the point they're making.

Why would you think that? Such accounts would be trying to make Trump look good.

Trump promised to lower prices. A complaint after he is in office about rising prices should make it very obvious what those people thought they were voting for.

when I knowingly voted to be taxed on all foreign food

You're assuming "knowingly". Trump told people tariffs were going to lower costs, falsely claiming that the foreign countries would be picking up that tab. If person X doesn't independently know/learn that tariffs basically never work that way, then the OP reaction makes perfect sense.

This also isn't LAMF at all—LAMF is about supporting something being done, but expecting (without evidence) that it will only be done to Others, and not you. She obviously didn't support raising prices at all—the person you voted for NOT doing as they promised is failing to meet the most fundamental requirement for an LAMF situation.

This tweet is essentially:

You promised to lower prices, but prices went up, this is NOT what I voted for.

For it to be LAMF, you have to actually get what you're expecting others to get. The person you voted for NOT doing what they promised to do is literally the opposite of LAMF.

Basically:

I voted for the Leopards Eating Faces party, I never thought they'd...wait, they're not eating anyone's faces

is the equivalent of the situation happening here.

Not LAMF.