doodoo_wizard

joined 4 months ago
[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I cannot stress enough how bad of an idea it is to try and use a boot or portable apps usb.

Schools and companies are generally very alert about that kind of thing due to many many high profile incidents of malware, ransomware, data exfiltration etc, and also all the movies and tv shows.

Bring your own device is the only way. Bring your own network is often a necessity, so be prepared to tether your phone to your device for internet access.

You also probably want to look normal too. Swallow your pride and use a mac when you do this and no one will bat an eye. Break out the duct taped together thinkpad at your own risk.

[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

I found that very confusing but I’m not very smart so that’s not a judgement to set your watch by.

Privacy is who can see or hear you, security is how protected from an adversary you are, anonymity is if people know who you are when you’re being seen or heard.

Open bathroom window facing the street is a privacy issue. Unlocked front door is a security issue. Uncovered face or tattoos or whatever when out in public is an anonymity issue.

[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

The real question is what you’re trying to accomplish and why.

That informs your choices.

Privacy, security and anonymity are different things.

[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Just literally finding any reason to say no.

E: I want to be a little more clear, rather than policing language or tone, I responded to help that person understand. The mods did what they do and I believe rightly removed the offending posts.

I do believe the conditions around rust at the present moment create a perverse incentive. Because rust is a common language for junior developers and commonly has mit licenses and is very well suited to llm analysis from a running heap or code perspective it ends up being very useful and attractive to companies who want to get rid of senior devs, use more ai and not have to contribute their work back to the public.

That’s a perverse incentive.

[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Wow, where are those requirements published? I’m sure more people would follow the rules of the project if it were made clear that input is contingent upon some existing level of community involvement…

Of course, I have never seen such rules put in place except to exclude the most base mlm scam spammers on mailing lists, but that’s neither here nor there.

Shouldn’t my obvious willingness to engage with people about this topic serve as some sort of indicator that I’m serious and not “drive by”?

Shouldn’t the fact that I’m not being rude or crass like the other poster you brought up (to achieve rhetorical ends I’m not exactly clear on!) be an indicator that my input should be taken seriously?

[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

So open source is only for people who already in the club then? Who gets to have a say? What are the restrictions on that say?

MIT defenders are laveyian satanists until someone has an opinion they disagree with lol.

I’m genuinely astounded that a recurring argument for simply dismissing suggestions to change the license to the one the original project had is “that’s my purse, I don’t know you!”

I could understand where you’re coming from if the people were, to a man, rude and demanding. Having read lots of threads about rust/mit rewrites of c/gpl stuff and participated in several, they’re pretty often just like me: politely presenting a perfectly reasonable argument even when met with very defensive pushback.

[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml 9 points 12 hours ago

If you use Debian, even the simple “package popularity contest” is a default “no” in the installer.

That said, your personal conception of privacy is gonna be different than lots of other people’s.

[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago

Worth noting that a company used extremely small models and found something like 80+% of what mythos is claimed to have found.

The claimed circumstances are different, “mythos, go find exploits in open source codebases” vs “model, find a vulnerability in FreeBSD”, but there’s a subtle distinction.

[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

Yes.

Open source is more than code, it’s software for everyone including non programmers.

[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago

Oh no, with so few gpl packages how will i maintain an unkempt beard and bald ponytail?! How will my ketchup stained Grateful Dead tee hold together at this critical low level of gpl? At this rate my bare feet will stop stinking up the break room!

[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh no, a non gpl package on my computer? How did you find out about my one weakness! I’m melting, melting! Oh, what a world, what a cruel, cruel world!

[–] doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (8 children)

lol at “users don’t count”

view more: next ›