fafferlicious

I'm curious if you have recommendations on how to structure or keep the notes. I find that I struggle reading technical documentation or how to structure notes so they're easy to refer to. Have any tips or guides you can share?

Because it's not. The base architecture of how it works is by probabilistic word suggestion. That isn't thought.

We have a concept of self. We understand our place. We can interpret and respond to entirely new situations. LLMs routinely fail that. They regularly fall into local minima that keep it on the wrong path, and I've personally seen them just... Get lost in the weeds and swing back and forth based on what you tell it.

Give it a protein sequence and tell it to calculate the pI. Then tell it it's wrong. "Oh my bad yes you're right it's {whatever you said it was}."

Tell it you lied and that the number you said was wrong, and it turns up saying "Yes, you're correct, the pI is {original value}" - that is objectively false.

That is not the behavior of something that thinks. That's the behavior of a simple probability model updating priors and weighting things differently by the most recent information you gave it.

LLMs are soulless, brainless, thoughtless word generators. And they have some uses.

don't upload it to the internet!

or use a smart phone

or corporate searches that track you

or go to any website with ads - they track you

hell don't even search the internet! your ISP tracks dns requests

or use a modern tv that tracks what is on your screen

or you can do custom phone from - just unlock the bootloader, root it, and install! then just setup pihole/adguard/self-host everything

it's simple, for privacy just go live in a yurt in the woods to not be tracked 24/7

While that's correct, I think you're ignoring how much sway a figurehead can hold.

Also it's important to keep in mind, that the childfucker-in-chief may just classify the committee as political appointees and fire them (See Project 2025 and Schedule F). Legality doesn't matter.

He wrote an executive order clearly in violation of the Constitution to remove birthright citizenship, and the Supreme Court said "the real unconstitutionality is nationwide blocks."

I...think that's their point. The only reason it seems good is because you're bad and can't spot that is bad, too.

I have the new pixel fold. The first and most important part is to understand how Google views the warranty on the inner screen.

Within two weeks I had what seemed to be hairline fractures on the inner screen and a potential artifact in the fold crease. I wasn't too worried but I was going to have them check on it. Before I could take it in to the Google store, it snapped. The entire screen flooded black within 14 hours when I went back to the store.

I was informed that this wasn't covered under warranty, but they'd make an exception because i literally bought it two weeks prior.

Their stance is that once the screen is that fatally flawed manufacturing defects and misuse damage (i.e. dropping) looks identical. The curvy bendy middle means the outer edges are under more stress and stiffer so when the screen breaks even from defects or creates impact shatter lines.

Based on this alone, I wouldn't recommend anyone get the phone. Not without expecting to have to pay for the insurance plan and to budget for replacing the inner screen at least once. It's significantly heavier and with the fear of breaking, I have a heavy duty dbrand case. So the phone feels like a bloody brick.

That said, I do love it. And I don't know if I'll go back. I don't know if I'll stick to the form factor either. I do a lot of home server shenanigans on it. Home assistant. Control my tv. I live multi-tasking on it when taking notes. I could buy a phone and a tablet for cheaper. But there's something about just having the extra size always handy rather than having to walk around the house with a mini-tablet.

Just be aware that there are huge, glaring downsides to the form factor before you buy in. It is objectively cool and I love unfolding it. It never doesn't feel futuristic.

Before I can answer if your "criticisms" would be allowed in any communities, I need to see it.

So let's see it, what criticisms are you looking to have allowed?

another vote for walkaway - i got hooked on the idea of "git, but for houses"

What would their response look like if it were almost entirely hyperbole and fiction?

Would they just let that sit on shelves uncontested orrrrr...would they launch a PR blitz to discredit the author and book?