friendlymessage

joined 1 year ago
[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It would strengthen the EU if Hungary were to leave

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What an odd thing to say... "If conditions would be completely different the statistics would be different, therefore I don't trust the statistics". What's your point exactly?

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why's that? I drove a Cupra Born last week, pretty decent imo. I also drove a VW ID3 and a BMW i3. So far the only European EV I didn't like was the Audi e-tron. I haven't driven a Korean or Chinese EV yet, so I can't really compare. What do you prefer about them?

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 4 points 5 months ago

Why the fuck would you make this about the US? Or Iran?

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 2 points 6 months ago

Well, then it's crown princess

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Contrary to popular belief, what you see here is a unihorn.

A unicorn is actually this: 🌽 common mistake.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Usually you would go with the current pronouns too even when talking about anything happening before the outing. But apparently they isn't wrong anyway, I was mistaken

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 2 points 6 months ago

Ah, okay, then I'm mistaken. I just saw that Wikipedia goes by he/him.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 2 points 6 months ago (7 children)

I know they/them seems inclusive, but Page goes by he/him. He's trans not non-binary

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think so.

https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/verfassungsschutz-afd-102.html

Kommt ein Verbotsverfahren? Mit der Neubewertung durch das Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz dürfte die Debatte um ein Verbotsverfahren gegen die AfD neu entfacht werden. Allerdings gibt es keinerlei Automatismus: Die Bewertung als "erwiesen rechtsextremistisch" ist weder die Voraussetzung dafür, noch ist ein Verbotsverfahren die zwangsläufige Folge.

Translation:

Will a ban procedure be implemented? The reassessment by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution is likely to reignite the debate about banning the AfD. However, there is no automatic process: The assessment as "proven right-wing extremist" is neither a prerequisite for it, nor is a ban procedure the inevitable consequence.

The reassessment means that more resources can be invested and that the intelligence services have more tools at their disposal to monitor the party e.g. spying on them and not solely relying on monitoring the media. I think it also means that civil servants cannot be members of the party.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Absolutely. The AfD is careful to walk the line. What they want according to their program is abhorrent and stupid but not illegal. That's why no party was banned since the 50s, parties know what they can and can't state publicly.

view more: next ›