jjjalljs

joined 2 years ago
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 3 days ago

My ‘needs’ include what makes me want to continue living, regardless of what it looks like from your perspective

My parents would fight about this sometimes. They would blur "need" and "want" together, and that caused difficulties. It's imprecise and, in my opinion, immature, to conflate the two categories. If you're looking at a budget and you smush everything into "needs", how are you going to know what to cut? The electric bill by any reasonable metric is more important than another lego death star, assuming you plan to continue living in society.

Furthermore, "I can't quit my job at [evil megacorp], because then I might not be able to do luxury dining experiences as often" is laughable. Like, sure, there's no way to live pure in our capitalist hellscape. We all have bills to pay. But highlighting "I like broadway" as the justification for "I help build AI used by ICE to deport people"? Come on. I'd respect it more if they just said out right that they don't give a shit about other people. At least that'd be honest.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't think most people could live on 65% of their current income. Many people are poor and can't handle a surprise $500 expense.

I could live happily on the median income of my area (NYC) - $113,400. Even if I got a more expensive apartment, I could make that work.

I do wonder about people's budgets sometimes. One of my friends has crushing medical, student, and credit card debt so they're always struggling. But another friend was like "I can't leave my job at [evil megacorp]! I need the money!" But when pressed slightly, their "needs" included broadway plays, fine dining, and every hot new game on steam (that they don't even play). Most people are probably between those two extremes.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 16 points 3 days ago
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 21 points 3 days ago

Have you tried explaining something to someone lately? A lot of people don't care and don't understand. About anything

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How many of the bosses can you walk in and just wipe the floor with on the first try

A pretty good amount, though that's confounded by playing lots of similar games over the years. But, like, I see the boss lift his weapon way up and I go "I bet he's going to swing. I should get out of the way." Sure, there is an element to "I've seen this before - I know if I run behind him after the big butt stomp I can hit him easily", but that's hardly unique to fromsoft.

What sort of games don't have enemies that you learn their moves? Like, you play Baldur's Gate 3 and you learn "ok, that wizard has Sleep prepared, I should keep my HP up." Or you play Hades and learn "ok, these guys like to charge but then take a second to recover". This complaint is not unique to souls-likes but I don't know if I've heard it brought against any other game.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 days ago (5 children)

“Souls-like” games - memorise attack patterns, the game. Not hard, just tedious.

Are people memorizing attack patterns? This one comes up a lot and I don't really get it. The boss does a thing and I react, which is how most real time combat games are, I think?

I guess something like Skyrim you mostly just stand there and trade blows.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 3 days ago

I know I'm biting bait but I rarely got jumped by the "guy around the corner" traps because I looked before walking in. Counter intuitively, running in will also often avoid the worst of it.

I remember people complaining about the floor traps in the first game and I was like "you mean the raised tiles that are a different color? Yeah I was careful around those". Player messages also help.

It's okay the game isn't for you - but "literally can't win on the first try" is hyperbole.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Some of the leadership is getting a lot of wealth, true. The majority seem to be losing more. Loss of government programs (eg: Medicare). Return of preventable diseases (eg: measles). Pollution and climate change.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Every accusation is a confession, right? That's how conservatives work. They're unimaginative people with poor empathy. They think about what they would do and assume that's what everyone else would do, too. They are trash. Failures. Disappointments.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I also don't recommend bringing all that technology. The best of road trips I've done were from interacting with the other people. You can play elden ring at home. It shouldn't be a priority.

I had a game boy on several road trips I did with my parents, and I barely remember the trips. I had nothing but a flip phone with one I did with friends, and had a lot more fun with them. Maybe because I was older and they were my friends, though.

Bring some low tech entertainment. Cards. Small board games. Dice. There are light weight pen and paper rpgs and word games you could do on the go (eg: Fate).

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 6 days ago

I'm pretty sure Wikipedia isn't a government entity and thus not subject to whatever their fever dream is. Republicans are the worst, and many of them are quite stupid as well

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Moderately irritated by having to explain "it's literally j j j all js like the word all J's but not this part" all the time

view more: next ›