You're not going to find a rational, well reasoned, explanation. It's just emotions. Fear, pride, shame. Most people are too cowardly to do any difficult introspection, and an older person who's probably never practiced it is a unlikely to start now.
jtrek
joined 4 months ago
I really would like less news coverage of trump supporters. Their opinions are bad. I'd like the news media to focus on humanizing everyone else.
All tools are not equally safe nor should they all be publicly available.
A chainsaw is a tool that you might cause harm with if you use it in stupid ways. We don't give chainsaws out to children. We don't use chainsaws for cutting dinner.
There are human elements to the problem but that's not a big reveal.
The trouble with statements predicated with “always and under all circumstances” is that they are intended to include all circumstances.
Yeah that's a really broad statement. You just need one case where democracy is not preferred, and the whole statement is false. Democracy is not preferred when the majority wants to do evils.
The insurance companies want to make money.
There are no (enforced) laws prohibiting this behavior.
Very few insurance company decision makers are murdered in the street.
Change one or more of these, and you'll get better results.
Sure, being too picky can lead to loneliness. But that's kind of off topic from "you'll have more rolls of the dice in a place with more people", which was my earlier argument.
I wouldn't want to settle for someone with no shared interests and a not-my-type body just because they're here. Everyone involved deserves better.
“you’ll settle for whoever’s around” is a compelling argument - if whoever is around happens to be good enough
Bit of a tautology there. My point is if there's only 1 person of your age/gender(s) then it's longer odds they're going to be a good match. Sure, they might be "good enough" but wouldn't you rather have "great"?
I'm don't think "you'll settle for whoever's around" is a compelling argument.
Furthermore, there are few places where it's actually like a rom-com and the waitress sets you up. There can't be a lot of people in that situation because then there wouldn't be so few people that they can be matched up. Most people live in cities or suburban wastelands.
Well, they can be unhappy about it but that doesn't change how you'll have more chances of meeting a partner where there's more people doing more stuff.
Dating apps. They suck, but there's a lot you can do (without paying money) to improve your odds.
Go to meetups. They exist for hobbies (board games, running, bird watching) and regions (North Brooklyn hangout). Don't go cruising but go for the thing and meet people.
Join a rec sport league. There's a bunch of soccer ones here.
If you live somewhere shitty, you're going to have a worse time. I live in a big city so there's a lot of people doing stuff. If I lived out in the sticks, there might be a dozen people of my desired age and gender(s) total.
Seems fair. Was a pretty big fuck up. Might deter others from making similar fuck ups.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do-gooder_derogation
If someone else is doing something good and you're not, it's easier to lash out at them than accept that you're not a flawless person. Since veganism often has a moral dimension (eg: cruelty to animals, environmental damage), some people struggle with this. They want to be good people, but eating meat is being cast as bad. Thus, lash out at whatever's making them feel bad.