They’re always rentals though, correct It’ll be interesting to see which way it swings, for sure. Stupid stupid rule either way.
kieron115
joined 2 years ago
Taking a huge payment from Comcast and Verizon would be my guess. The language appears to exclude ISP-owned routers.
It would be funny if, like, the UniFi line got banned but the EdgeOS line didn’t just based on target audience
I’m thinking exempt based on the FCC language of “designed to be installed by the consumer”. ISP provided routers are usually hooked up by the installer tech. Which makes me wonder which ISP chortled orange man’s balls to get this passed.
It would seem to exclude ISP provided routers =/
Based on the language, it would seem to exclude ISP provided routers as those are not “designed to be installed by the consumer”. It also excludes anything not SoHo.
I’m thinking exempt based on the FCC language of “designed to be installed by the consumer”. ISP provided routers are usually hooked up by the installer tech. Which makes me wonder which ISP chortled orange man’s balls to get this passed.
Now tell me how to brew beer while I run and you’ve got me on board.
Not after this we won't.
the runabouts are more like space RVs and the quadrant their open road
Eagle 5 has entered the chat.
I really like the pre-Federation Vulkan ships. They're so elegant looking.
They wouldn't be forwarding packets between networked systems unless you're using one as a hotspot. And even then I don't know if the term "networked systems" would include a single computer or if they intend it to mean an area network of some kind.