knighthawk0811

joined 2 years ago
[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 6 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

one of the most profitable companies in the world, it seems very likely

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 26 points 16 hours ago (10 children)

except only loosing 568m is just "the price of doing business" for them and it's not much of a deterrent to make them stop. they made more than that by doing this so it's still a net profit

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

weird to think that the richest people in the world wouldn't try to get more money, that's their entire thing

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (7 children)
[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 days ago

this means they can catch the average person

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

i think the difference was only ever going to be when they felt like running the extra processing to do the work.

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

so these are the only 2 ways then? huge if true

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 week ago (5 children)

wait, weren't they always doing this?

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 weeks ago

remember the time that Leon Skum turned starlink off for Ukraine just before a Russian attack?

he can never again be trusted. especially when it comes to safety and security

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago

different, yes. but by how much and will it be different in ways that truly matter

[–] knighthawk0811@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

yeah, might seem good to have yet another choice, but it's an illusion

view more: next ›