lennivelkant

Everything about this seems almost designed to murder small businesses.

Those with enough capital backing, resources and funds can take the hit, maybe cut some expenses, shedding crocodile tears about how terrible the economic impact of this trade war has affected them while dispassionately watching scores of no-longer-employees pack their things and try to figure out how to tell their kids that the promised trip next month they'd been looking forward to all year is cancelled.

The point is that the company being sued has to pay those millions in the first place. The law firm does pay itself rather well for that work, but I'd consider class actions to be one of the more defensible legal actions.

The "Contain, Verify, Explain Foundation", dedicated to the study of and protection against cyber-anomalies

Satin undies?

Close. Soiled undies.

It's a cargo cult. They don't understand, but they like what it promises, so they blindly worship. Sceptics become unbelievers, visionaries become prophets and collateral damages become sacrifices.

They may use different terms, but if some job became obsolete, that's just the price of a better future to them. And when the day of Revelation comes, they'll surely be among the faithful delivered from the shackles of human labour to enjoy the paradise built on this technology. Any day now...

It's not the goal itself that's the issue. Protecting kids from harmful content until they're ready to deal with it is absolutely a worthwhile endeavour.

But the means to that end often pose a massive security and privacy issue.

You're supposed to give all your identifying details to some website and trust them, that they'll use it only for the legal purpose of verifying that identity and promptly deleting them, rather than selling them to criminals who now have everything they need for identity theft. Hell, just storing them is a risk because we all know how many companies (and people) treat IT security as an afterthought at best and a breach compromising the identification of thousands of people would be a fucking nightmare.

And what if your kid tries to circumvent it? Now their face is out there on some server, whether or not they succeed. Is that really better?

The argument is that the onus should be on parents to protect their children and help them find their way safely, rather than compromising everyone else with poorly thought-out and invasive policies.

Heh, flavour

(I like Fedora, but it obviously doesnt taste as good)

...and then you finished reading the sentence, right? Just in case it adds more nuance or context, or makes an argument you didn't consider, right? You engaged their comment in good faith and gave them the chance to make their case before deciding whether you actually disagree with them, right?

Most cases of "we can't find anyone good for this job" can be solved with better pay. Make your opening more attractive, then you'll get more applicants and can afford to be picky.

Getting the money is a different question, unless you're willing to touch the sacred corporate profits....

My milk ranking:

Almond < Dairy < Soy < Oat

I rarely drink any milk at all, but when I do, it's gotta be oat.

(Also not a vegan, but that doesn't have anything to do with my taste here)

Your wife is right to hate it. It's rather shallow and narrow-minded.

That aside, if calories-to-price is your metric, are you growing your own food?

Oat is GOAT

(The acronym, not the animal)