The reciprocal tarifs aren't. He mostly calls trade deficits other countries changing us which it isnt and uses that to compute the rates.
michaelmrose
joined 2 years ago
The math doesn't work because given enough rolls you literally always go bankrupt no matter what bankroll you start with. Take the simplest option a fair coin where you win on tails and lose on heads. Real actual random flips will contains runs of heads. Let N be the number of rolls required to bankrupt you for any value of N. The more you roll the more the probability of such a run increases towards 1.
You could end up bankrupting a billion dollar bank starting with 10 dollar bets. It's only sound if you have a literally infinite bank. For any finite bank you just have to play longer to lose but you always end up losing.
It's not sound actually because it trivially ends up in nonsensical amounts of money and any sufficiently long series of rolls will have an increasing chance of having a sufficiently long series of losses such that no reasonable person can possibly recover from it. For instance who that can afford to bet 1024x 100 or $100,000 on a single game of chance is excited by betting $100?
It's nonsense.
Cops in most of those situations have probable cause to believe a crime has been committed. Not so here.
It didn't cease to exist nor were its people required to sonehow all flee to France
This division was a mistake we undid ultimately and their is continuity between pre ww2 Germany, nazi Germany, and present day Germany is many or even most respects.
We punished its leaders and some of the worst criminals. We did not declare the state which included millions of people to simply not exist render its land to France and drive millions into the sea or extermination.
Its people have every right to remain.
Even the allies didn't deny Germany had a right to exist just its then leadership and most individually culpable
Kidnapping comes with the threat of violence if you resist. She committed no crime so this is kidnapping.
Their lack of manpower means delayed updates to fix zero days compared to Firefox
From their site:
LibreWolf is always built from the latest Firefox stable source, for up-to-date security and features along with stability.
As soon as firefox pushes a release, for instance to fix a security vulnerability, librewolf can immediately rebuild It is literally just firefox with different setting. Delay between firefox release and librewolf release should be negligible. You can verify this by noting that 136.0 was offered on the same day.
https://codeberg.org/librewolf/source/commit/2b90daeb5aa5a80443f4f7655393f610fb16418a
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/136.0/releasenotes/
The difference in time between firefox and librewolf security updates is less than the variance between users updating their machines.
Librewolf is firefox with different settings how does it not already benefit from Firefox's security team
We value the gains both immediate and presumed more than the harm
view more: next ›
EVERYONE except you knows what