perestroika

joined 2 years ago
[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

They have, but this does not look like a fiber optic scenario.

Guesses: either:

  • autonomous navigation by terrain and compass (assuming that satnav systems are denied), or
  • one swarm member using a ridiculously good (satellite?) radio to supply other swarm members with guidance from Ukraine, or
  • guidance via Russian mobile phone networks.
[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Missile silos are sadly, ridiculously hardened. You may have to hit a single door with 10+ drones to get through.

Aircraft are perfect targets, since an aircraft must be light and cannot be hidden underground too easily.

Also, missile silos aren't being used to attack Ukraine. Knocking one out would have no effect on the safety of people in Ukraine. Aircraft however, are used daily / weekly. Tangible benefit is immediate - less air raids, less missiles fired, less glide bombs dropped.

It would also be sweet if a shortage of radar planes occurred - Russia not knowing what's happening in its airspace would allow Ukrainian long-range drones to reach where they must.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 67 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Clever and economical, and 100% high value military targets. I wish the guys who pulled this off, all the luck they can have. :)

It is possible that Russia's selection of AWACS planes (about 10 left) decreased even more.

The "sheds" were more like wooden boxes. They had a fake roof, the upper layer of which a mechanism could remove. Between the roof beams - "nests" for drones. This cargo was given for transport to ordinary truck companies. There's even a video where cops have detained a trucker while drones are taking off from his truck and heading towards Belaya airfield, ordinarily unreachable to Ukrainian drones since it's 4000 km away. I'm afraid the trucker will be facing some hard times. I hope they understand he was deceived, though, and eventually let him go.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Sea-buckthorn. Because they fix nitrogen from the air, grow fast and reproduce with shoots.

However, they have thorns (good if there is a deer risk) and the berries are small. The plants aren't very long-lived (you can see signs of aging after 10 years already). And whole plants (not flowers) have a gender, you need to figure out which ones are male or female. They pollinate with wind.

If it has to be a proper tree, then cherries.

Least favourite? I've cut down one plum tree, and will likely cut down another too. Pollination problems (they don't self-pollinate), fruit spoiling on branches, apparently their good harvest depends on cutting the branches properly - I'm not competent to grow plum trees, except the small ones (Prunus domestica subsp. insititia - damascene plums?) which are foolproof, and also reproduce with shoots.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A few hours later, the "few details" emerge:

But he suggested that Ukraine should neither rearm nor mobilise and that western military aid to Kyiv be halted during the 30-day ceasefire.

Some people probably say that "it was worth trying" (others would say it wasn't).