qjkxbmwvz

joined 2 years ago
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 14 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Not the same, but for my Immich backup I have a raspberry pi and an HDD with family (remote).

Backup is rsync, and a simple script to make ZFS snapshots (retaining X daily, Y weekly). Connected via "raw" WireGuard.

Setup works well, although it's never been needed.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Link(s) in post contain punctuation and break, at least on my client. Here's the codeberg link (working);

https://codeberg.org/BobbyLLM/llama-conductor

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 2 months ago

Yeah I've been very happy with them.

No experience with their software, but the service is great


I have an ARM SBC with WireGuard handling my tunnels, and my router does the rest (so my TV/guest SSID/personal SSID/whatever can get routed over Mullvad with no client setup). My DNS forwarders are each routed through a different Mullvad interface too.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 9 points 2 months ago

You can’t beat

🤔

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

https://www.superbowl-ads.com/1997-tabasco-mosquito/

Best ad ever IMHO (sorry for funky link, YouTube if you prefer).

No dialog, no rampant consumerism (hot sauce is a necessary food), no sex/sexism, no emotional manipulation.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

From link:

NOTE: The script is broken, DO NOT ATTEMPT TO USE THE SCRIPT NOW. Attempting to run it may get your account flagged stopping you from trying face verification either temporarily or permanently, forcing you to use your ID.

pr: https://github.com/xyzeva/k-id-age-verifier/pull/12

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or, malicious compliance by someone with a moral compass. Best is to somehow leak documents wholesale. But if that's not possible, I think the next best way to all but guarantee that the information gets out is to do a lousy job censoring, and let "The Internet" do the rest. It also makes the administration look even more stupid, especially in the eyes of technically minded folks.

But yeah, not the best and brightest, that's certainly a possibility.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No one "shatters," "breaks," or otherwise ~~surpasses~~ violates the diffraction limit. Rather, you operate in such a way that the diffraction limit does not apply.

This is not to take away from these accomplishments at all! All manner of super resolution techniques are fantastic, but they're not violating the diffraction limit; they are violating the assumptions that go into the diffraction limit, or they are using a different definition of resolution (which is completely valid), or both.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would probably add "transmit power" in there somewhere, but I guess if you're assuming regulatory limits then it's not a big variable.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Global Outbreak World Response Outreach Network, perhaps?

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 11 points 3 months ago

Every so often there's a post on Lemmy about how you should stick it to your landlord and put grease down the drain.

This is why that's a bad idea, and it sucks for everyone, not just your landlord.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

Not sure how serious your comment is, but I could certainly imagine Microsoft introducing new dependencies/hooks/all-executables-must-support-copilot, etc., that break compatibility faster than Wine can keep up. Glad to hear that's not the case!

For old stuff though...yeah, I'd hope it's not moving backwards :)

view more: ‹ prev next ›