qvi8dhqln

joined 2 days ago
[–] qvi8dhqln@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Believe me, if every of your life was spoken about before it arrives you would complain, because you'd want simplicity and convemience, which would become a form of rest

[–] qvi8dhqln@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Well, how do I calculate if the time-money I save on preparing food > price money ai give up for said food?

 

Like come on, people are otraged about the most minor stuff, but somehoe can't be bothered to boycot or change the situation with convenience pricig, where same stuff you buy at a store is 10-20x the price per unit.

"Youre taking advantage of my tiredness, making me pay more of my hard-earned money for the privilege of being too tired to prepare my own food/drinks myself, essentially making me work more hours for having worked too many hours and being tired as a resilt of it. So: making me more tired for being tired already"

[–] qvi8dhqln@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

just because you dont like my tone doesnt mean Im not in the right here, and youre gaslighting like a buncha others here

[–] qvi8dhqln@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, got a few things mixed up here, buddy: people who didn't like what I had to say even though it wasn't a personal attack on them but simple a call for discussion are, not me

[–] qvi8dhqln@lemmy.world -5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Hate to break it to you, pal, but some people would make the opposite conclusion, that is being: you're the problem.

[–] qvi8dhqln@lemmy.world -1 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

Nah, buddy, I am not trying to be him, your psychoanalysis is wrong

[–] qvi8dhqln@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago

Whats "free will" by you? In a sense that we can basically apply the logic of "he/she should have done x so y didn't happen" same way we can apply the logic of "external circumstances made them do it" to basically ANYTHING. There's always some alternative path (taking which can be attributed to "choice") that a person could have undertaken to avoid an undesirable outcome. Crashed a car? = shouldn't have driven (you CHOSE to sit behind a wheel). Killed someone? can be either "you chose to kill them" or "emotional turmoil, caused by their behaviour/you loosing your loved one blah blah blah made yoj do it"

[–] qvi8dhqln@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, it would be in them. Inability to adequately respond to the opposite side's take is a sign of... inadequacy and emotional immaturity. You feel an emotion "this is not right, why is this person thinking that" and you responce is to try to personally attack them or shut them down (instead of trying to understand their reasoning)

[–] qvi8dhqln@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago

Being right makes me right, not being snarky. Im not a fucking bot, for startera and Im not a fucking troll for seconders

view more: next ›