redballooon

joined 3 years ago
[–] redballooon@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, that escalated quickly

[–] redballooon@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

How dare you! Anthropic has it's own search API, Claude doesn't need Google ('s API)

[–] redballooon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Oh yes they do, as a multiplicator of everything that lobbies and billionaires say and do.

[–] redballooon@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Fine, you don't trust them to keep a contract.

With that mindset you can't even open a bank account or do any other daily business. Or can you? Why trust those contracts but not Apple or Google's?

Google is quite specific how they're using your private data, and Apple as well. You can look into the contract and choose.

Meta has their scandal and has proven untrustworthy. Zuck very first known comments from Facebook success shows how he dismisses his users as idiots. But Google? They were even explicit when they were fine with evil.

And Apple at least has a plausible business concept to not automatically assume they must lie. So, what's the reason other than "they might lie", which applies to your bank and doctors as well?

[–] redballooon@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Glad to know it's seven conditions that Iran wants to be met. The article made the number very clear, and also that Iran is set and firm about this.

Everything else I would expect from a somewhat journalistic medium is missing. For example, what these seven conditions are, in what way they were agreed upon in June, why they are still allegedly not met.

Nothing there, just a very poor repetition of the Iranian position. Not worth the paper it was not printed on, but also not worth a repost.