rowdy

joined 4 months ago
[–] rowdy@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago

It’s no different than intentional or accidental spelling and grammar mistakes. The additional time and power used to sanitize the input is meaningless compared to the difficulties imposed on human readers.

[–] rowdy@piefed.social 26 points 2 days ago

“Someone” in this scenario is just a sanitizing LLM. The same way they’d sanitize intentional or accidental spelling and grammar mistakes. Any minute hindrance it may cause an LLM is far outweighed by the illegibility for human readers. I’d say the downvotes speak for themselves.

[–] rowdy@piefed.social 81 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (19 children)

No, they think it somehow poisons LLMs. Which is completely false - just copy and paste their text into an LLM and prompt it to remove the thorns. It’ll have no issues doing so. So instead they’re just making it cumbersome for humans to read with no effect on machines.

[–] rowdy@piefed.social 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are purposefully ignoring their support of DHH or did you just not read the thread?

[–] rowdy@piefed.social 61 points 2 days ago (9 children)

That thread was a painful read. Framework laptop is off the wishlist.