That sounds really great! I see now why people like it
sem
The only way I know of giving one computer multiple IP addresses is proxmox but can you do that with docker also?
I don't really understand what a TCP stack is, but my question is if your IP address is 192.168.1.2, and you want to run two different services that both have a web interface. You still have to configure both of them to use different port numbers.
If you don't think of doing that and they both default to 8000 for example and you try to run them both at the same time, I imagine you would get a conflict when you try to go to 192.168.1.2:8000 or even localhost:8000.
I still feel like I'm missing something. Flatpaks help you sidestep dependency hell, so what is docker for? What advantages does further containerization give you if you aren't going as far as proxmox vms.?
I guess I've only tried running one service at a time that needed a database, so I get it if a Docker container can include a database and a flatpak cannot.
Cg = computer generated?
How isolated could it really be as a docker container vs a separate machine or proxmox? You will still have to make sure that port numbers don't conflict, etc, but now there is a layer of complexity added (docker)
I'm not saying it is bad, I just don't understand the benefits vs costs.
Ootl what is "fortnight kill bill?"
I know Fortnite and Kill Bill separately but not in juxtaposition.
Spies hate him
Yeah lmgtfy.com was funny bc at that time Google search really was good, and some questions really were super low effort and annoying, and lmgtfy was a little in joke to let off some steam, kind of like rick rolls.
Of course some people were a dick about honest new people trying to get started. A problem since the original Septembers and perennial during this eternal September.
This is something I've never understood about firewalls. If the vacuum cleaner is uploading and downloading stuff from https://somecorpo.net/, what stops it from listening for remote commands on that same connwction?
Earlier in the article he says that he only disabled some of the network connections but he left open the ones for firmware updates and stuff so to me it's not impossible that it was able to receive remote commands although I would certainly want to see more technical details to satisfy my curiosity.
The article says in words that it was a remote command. But again, we don't have any details supporting that description. So maybe the journalist got it wrong.
Ok, thanks, I was wondering how a container would get its own IP address. A reverse proxy makes way more sense.