tal

joined 2 years ago
[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 5 months ago

They've apparently got an above-ground railroad, though.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Railroad

[–] tal@lemmy.today 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

You typically need to notify other members of a treaty of your withdrawal, and then there's some time delay until you're no longer bound by the terms. You can't just secretly withdraw, or treaties wouldn't be very meaningful.

EDIT: Yeah. The submitted article says that it happens in six months from today, and here's the treaty text on withdrawal:

https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.44_convention%20antipersonnel%20mines.pdf

Article 20

Duration and withdrawal

  1. This Convention shall be of unlimited duration.

  2. Each State Party shall, in exercising its national sovereignty, have the right to withdraw from this Convention. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other States Parties, to the Depositary and to the United Nations Security Council. Such instrument of withdrawal shall include a full explanation of the reasons motivating this withdrawal.

  3. Such withdrawal shall only take effect six months after the receipt of the instrument of withdrawal by the Depositary. If, however, on the expiry of that six- month period, the withdrawing State Party is engaged in an armed conflict, the withdrawal shall not take effect before the end of the armed conflict.

  4. The withdrawal of a State Party from this Convention shall not in any way affect the duty of States to continue fulfilling the obligations assumed under any relevant rules of international law.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago

I don't know how the Dutch see it, but I'm pretty sure that the US considers extreme ultraviolet lithography to be a technology with strategic importance. That is, it's more than some company's sales at stake.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

A 1920 pre-European-Union proposal to partition Europe into a set of radial political divisions centered on Vienna. I saved it to submit it to !map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz as part of a larger thread.

Higher resolution version.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if I'd call it a favorite, but Time Cube is pretty iconic of Internet zaniness for a certain period. It went down in 2015, a decade ago now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Cube

https://web.archive.org/web/20150506055228/http://www.timecube.com/index.html

[–] tal@lemmy.today 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

I could have guessed Liberia, but I remember being genuinely surprised when I first discovered that Belize spoke English. I'd have expected Spanish, given the geography.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago

Do you want the router to also be 10" rack-mountable? That seems like it'd be a big input into the hardware you get.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago

But it won't make the water taste like it didn't come from a pond.

They do make water filters that will pull larger stuff out.

I understand that the American Sawyer and the Swiss LifeStraw make popular small, portable devices.

https://www.sawyer.com/

https://lifestraw.com/

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Anyone tried water purifying tablets yet, and would you recommend them?

They'll kill bacteria in water, though obviously they can't pull chemicals out of it.

I wouldn't be worried about bottled water going bad after a year


I've kept distilled water for much longer than that


but if you want more capacity in a smaller package than by storing water, you can get a water still, distill water yourself as long as you have some source of water and some sort of sufficient heat (e.g. a fire).

kagis

https://www.amazon.com/Roots-Branches-VKP1208-Little-Distiller/dp/B07WSJ2H8C

If you don't have access to a water source but have sufficient electrical power


which in the past I'd have said probably isn't very likely if the government can't get water to the public in 72 hours, but isn't as crazy as it once might have been, what with people running around with beefy home solar setups and the like


it's possible to run devices that condense water out of the air off the cold side of a heat pump, these sorts of things:

https://www.amazon.com/Solaris-WaterGen-A10-Atmospheric-Generator/dp/B0DL4N1PRG

I'd guess that for most people, the most-practical and cost-effective approach is probably just to estimate how much water one might need and store that much potable water in advance. That takes care of the "have a source of water", "get any energy required to purify it", and "purify it" points all at one go. Doesn't require a lot of expertise, effort, or place constraints on your environment to open a bottle of water.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Earlier this year the European public was urged to stockpile enough food, water and essentials for 72 hours to cope with a military attack, natural disaster, power cut or major industrial accident.

Honestly, unless you have some sort of serious medical condition, most people should be just fine going 72 hours without food. We've a social convention of eating three meals a day, sure, but your body is quite able of running off stored energy for a long time. I've fasted for a week myself for the hell of it. I remember mentioning that to an aunt once, and she mentioned that she'd done two weeks.

This guy did over a year (though he was pretty heavy to begin with, had plenty of fat reserves).

Barbieri went from 456 pounds (207 kg) to 180 pounds (82 kg), losing 276 pounds (125 kg) and setting a record for the length of a fast.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Acquiring F-35A jets is “part of NATO’s nuclear mission”;

By March 2026, the UK will add 27 more jets: 12 F-35A and 15 F-35B;

I hadn't been following this closely recently, but if you go back far enough, the Royal Air Force had been planning to get F-35As and the Royal Navy F-35Bs. The A variant isn't equipped for carrier operations, which makes it not really viable for the Royal Navy, but has longer range and more payload. Then there was some discussion at one point about maybe just having both use F-35Bs to help leverage commonality, which I imagine the Royal Air Force wasn't too keen on. Sounds like they're back to both the A and B model.

view more: ‹ prev next ›