tatterdemalion

joined 2 years ago
[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maybe a dumb question: What exactly could go wrong? Has the MPAA done anything to stifle Kodi?

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Party at my place when it happens. Date TBD

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Less than $100 is tricky, but I've been meeting all your criteria with a Beelink EQ14. I also use it as my router.

an entire data center

What are you on about?

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks, I just rewatched that movie because of your comment.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Here's some that's significantly cheaper than the graph would suggest: https://www.amazon.com/G-SKILL-Trident-64GB-SDRAM-Memory/dp/B0BSB94VC2

Not that it's a good price in general or anything, but if you absolutely must buy now...

If your health check is broken, then you might not notice that a service is down and you'll fail to deploy a replacement. Or the opposite, and you end up constantly replacing it, creating a "flapping" service.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I just don't really understand the point they're trying to make. Japan is responding to OpenAI, which is a US company. They have the same copyright laws. None of the parties involved have any kind of edge over the other w.r.t. copyright law.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 43 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Japan's copyright law is very similar to the US, so I'm not sure what you're referring to.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pff OK if that's the argument you want to go with, I don't think we need to continue.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Sorry but in the case of Japan, it's definitely not logical. At best, they have an argument against over-tourism. But the Sanseito party acts like foreigners moving to Japan are creating a spike in crime. They literally have young women weeping through a megaphone on the street, crying that foreigners are rapists. But that's simply not backed up by statistics. Crime per capita has not increased, and the demographic committing the most serious crimes in Japan is predominantly native Japanese.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Last I looked into it, running an ATproto relay is highly cost-prohibitive compared to a fediverse instance.

 

AFAICT, if a Netflix account owner sets up a VPN for their household, then anyone sharing the account who routes their Netflix traffic through that VPN would appear to be accessing Netflix from that household's WAN IP address.

Is anyone doing this? Is it really that simple or are there more challenges?

EDIT: We get it, you like torrenting. Let's keep comments on topic folks.

 

I ask because it would be nice to use the "I2P mixed mode" features of qbittorrent, but I want to keep my clearnet traffic on the VPN.

Background

I have I2PD running only on my home gateway for better tunnel uptime.

To ensure that torrent traffic never escapes the VPN tunnel, I have configured qbittorrent to use only the VPN Wireguard interface.

Problem

I think this means qbittorrent I2P traffic will flow into the VPN tunnel, but then the VPN host won't know how to route back to my home gateway where the SAM bridge is running.

 

I've configured my i2pd proxy correctly so things are somewhat working. I was able to visit notbob.i2p. But sometimes Firefox really likes to replace "http" with "https" when I click on a link or even enter the URL manually into the bar. I have "HTTPS-only mode" turned off, and I also have "browser.fixup.fallback-to-https" set to "false" and "network.stricttransportsecurity.preloadlist" to false.

I tried spying on the HTTP traffic in web dev tools, and I see the request gets NS_ERROR_UNKNOWN_HOST. This does not happen when using the xh CLI HTTP client, so Firefox is doing something weird with name resolution. I made sure to turn off the Firefox DNS over HTTPs setting as well, but it didn't seem to make a difference.

I assume that name resolution needs to happen in i2pd. How can I force Firefox to let that happen?

Update: Chrome works fine.

Update: I started fresh and simplified the setup and it seems fixed. I'm not entirely sure why. The only things I've changed from default are DoH and the manual HTTP proxy.

view more: next ›