themurphy

joined 2 years ago
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only reason they dont share it with other apps, is because from a capitalist standing point, why the hell would you share information you want to sell?

Them being the only one having access to a billion peoples location data is why they are the richest company.

They very much do dell, and they very much share that data with the government they also pay a shitton of money in donations for ball rooms.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least in the EU they will implement a verification system, meaning you only have to verify with the official government, and then you can use a anonymised token that gives the porn sites only the age.

It's not perfect, but it's far better than everything else suggested.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 112 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

If we set aside the privacy nightmare, consider this.

Teens wont stop searching for porn. Would you rather they find it on not-moderated sites, that might also consist of illegal content? Or might consists of nudes from people than didnt consent to their picture being online?

Everything is just dumb about this.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Isnt it mostly the US who does that?

But to a burglar everbody steals.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 month ago (4 children)

At least the foreign country wont use the data to arrest and make laws against you.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago

What should happen is Nintendo paying a shitload in damages to Palworld.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dont think you need to overtake YouTube on day 1. Do you?

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago

So for what, 100 million people vs 8 billion, it's a problem.

I'll take that.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Honestly? If anyone could make a rival for YouTube it would be a big porn hosting site.

The infrastructure is already there. Just need to buy another domain and throw money at it.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

I'm talking about all the opinions already made up, that EU wanted to take away encryption and give us chat control.

They didnt want that.

It's like saying Denmark wants to throw out all immigrants, just because a small minority is proposing it. They dont.

Democracy is just great for media outlets, because they can bandwagon stupid proposals.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 62 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Luckily it's not the same body in the EU who's in charge of enforcing AND setting up proposals.

The EU is not a "one opinion" government body.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

They usually sue if the practice doesnt stop for over a year. They do send warnings before anything official comes out FYI.

But I dont know if they want to do anything though. No one but them and Apple knows for sure.

view more: ‹ prev next ›