wewbull

joined 2 years ago
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 6 months ago

🎶You are not alone...🎶

https://feddit.uk/comment/17885086

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 0 points 6 months ago

The Ryan Gosling film with Harrison Ford.

Aren't you proving my point?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Dallas Buyers Club

For which he won his oscar for Actor in a supporting role

House of Gucci

Supporting role behind Lady Gaga and Adam Driver

The Little Things

Nominated at Golden Gloves and SAG awards for best supporting role.

I'll give you Requiem and Mr Nobody, however there's no denying he doesn't carry films in general. He's an award winning supporting actor.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 6 months ago

It's not "let china fix this". The technology can be developed anywhere. It is being developed everywhere.

However nobody can stop China burning coal other than Xi Jinping. He is the world leader that can make that decision. All anybody else can do is try to convince him.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 6 months ago

I'm not saying they need to have a lower standard of living. I'm asking them to have a better standard of living. One without air pollution. Generate the power without burning coal.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 6 months ago

His music completely passed me by. I've only ever known him as an actor.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 41 points 6 months ago (20 children)

The weird thing with Jared Leto is that I've never felt he's been very successful, yet he's always had bunch of people hyping him. I can't think of him being a leading actor in anything I've ever seen. He's always been lower down the bill. You look at all his award nominations on IMDb and 90% of them are "supporting actor".

So why is he a name? I always put it down to him being involved with the "right" people in Hollywood. Those people obviously being very wrong.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 6 months ago

I'm sure German could do a compound of "spät erkennen" or similar for a late realisation.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

China is the one choosing coal to fuel it's exports. It's the government that has to change policy.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 6 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Yes, but it's coming down. Also, it doesn't really matter.

Fact is, the planet doesn't care about per-capita. It cares about absolute tonnes of CO2. When 3 billion are increasing the burning of coal, 350 million reducing their coal use isn't really significant.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (11 children)

Right now, China is the problem. Historically it's been the USA, but right now it's China.

The upcoming problem is India.

More specifically the problem is coal. China and India are ramping up their usage of coal whilst the rest of the world is phasing it out.

Yes, those countries are also building clean sources of power, but coal is about 55% of their primary energy each. 80% of Chinas primary energy comes from fossil fuels and 90% of India's. Their rate of new coal outstrips their use of wind and solar.

The earth cannot support the huge populations of these countries unless they are powered by something other than coal. Even oil and gas would be a huge improvement. These two governments hold all the power on this issue.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 6 months ago

If that was actually their expenditure I don't think they'd have their budget cut.

view more: ‹ prev next ›