when

joined 2 years ago
[–] when@lemmy.world 2 points 16 minutes ago

I am sorry for making you feel this way.

[–] when@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

Thanks for acknowledging the inconsistencies within social values and showing optimism for the ideal outcome.

[–] when@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago (2 children)

I have no mischievous intent against any group. I just saw some moral inconsistency. So I though let's AskLemmy about their opinion on this topic. People are answering pretty rationally and are not just outright dismissive.

[–] when@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I was looking for the logical consistency. They are accepting killing of animals (murder without consent) while condemning the rape (sex without consent) of animals.

[–] when@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Is there any historical evidence that relates zoophilia to decreasing the domesticated animals' population thus causing food scarcity? Is there a material basis for the condemnation? [Some religious scriptures suggest to kill the animal after performing copulation.] I never thought that way.

[–] when@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Who do you personally consider a bigger criminal?

  • Human murdering other animal without their consent?
  • Human raping other animal without their consent?

(We are making judgments solely based on the animal's perspective. So we can't include disingenuous human arguments like "They died a noble death for our survival".)

[–] when@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago
  • Zoophilia is Rape (sex without consent)
  • Killing animal is Murder .

In both cases we should be considering animal's perspective (what animals feel in both cases). We can't just involve human's perspective for our own convenience. Do animals consent to be murdered? I don't think so.

 

Be civil and follow principle of charity in the comments.

[–] when@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There are party loyalists out there. Unfortunately, they constitute the majority of population and they vote and decide who governs you. Can't neglect these unconscious/unaware populace.

[–] when@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The question was about behavior. Imagine if there are 4 children - Voting Blue kills 2 children and voting Red kills 3 children. By voting Blue - we've saved 1 child and start celebrating. The problem here is the behavior of cheering such leadership, by cheering we're burying the core problem of "Child killing" and erasing the acknowledgement of "No child should be killed" ideal from the mind of the masses.

 

Whenever I talk to any Democrat supporters, they by-default cheer their Presidents and then I've to remind them of their leader's illegal wars and war crimes. They condemn those acts and they go back to their cheerleading role - Why do they keep forgetting atrocities committed by their leaders? Why do they accept war criminals as their leader?