wjrii

joined 1 year ago
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 2 points 8 minutes ago

I assume certain short-term things will get better with anyone less crazy than Trump, but I agree the US is no longer reliable for anything long-term, and no other country should deal with us on the assumption that we'll give up certain short-term advantages for a long term stability within our sphere of influence. It's not even that the US was "good" (though I imagine the next hegemonic power could easily be worse), but across administrations, the US was generally intelligent about how to leverage its influence but retain enough goodwill to continue to do so indefinitely.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 9 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago)

I like to idly game this out because it truly reflects how narcissistic and uninformed he is. So, he's talking about admitting Canada as a single state. Lets assume somehow that happens, even though the Canadians themselves would undoubtedly push for as many states as possible if joining the US were the only option.

You've now got a new largest state by both population and area, and one that has ridiculous reserves of resources. It instantly becomes the most important state. It's also full of millions of people who didn't want to be Americans, and who've had a hundred years of more progressive governance then the US. Congratulations, Republicans, you've just skewed the Senate and completely fucked yourself in the House for a generation or more. You've also got 8 or 9 million Francophones who weren't even entirely sure they wanted to be CANADIANS, much less Americans, to say nothing of being Americans in a MAGA world. This is how real troubles begin.

So, in return for dubious "improvements" to the trade deficit, and certain (what?) administrative conveniences (I guess) for a military that already had basically all the access anyone would ever need, as well as a giant buffer territory you're not politically committed to defending with the same gusto you would your own soil, you completely upset the balance of power in Congress to your own party's detriment and add a huge population that hates their situation. Brilliant.

Although, I guess if you're just done with free and fair elections then a lot of these concerns evaporate...

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

There's constant running commentary and speculation, and biographical segments, and sometimes a little drama when surprising things happen, or expected things don't, and a large group of people simply care enough that they want to know as soon as a pick happens, though how organic the growth of that group has been is certainly open for debate.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you raise the tariffs to a billion percent then the US will get a billion dollars revenue for every $100 TV that comes from China! There will be so many millions of billions!!!!!! Why wasn't anyone smart enough to do this before?!?!?

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But, you see, he looks like a secretary of defense, so therefore he must be an excellent one!

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The natural resources, a tacit admission that Global Warming is real, continued control over a strategic area even after completely fucking over the perfectly good allies the US has now, and even though it's under the second largest ice sheet in the world, the island is just a tiny bit larger than the Louisiana Purchase, so I'm sure there's a huge ego factor.

I suppose it's a relief they're not talking about invading (for now), but Jesus what beatdown this all is.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I do sometimes think there is a bit of hand-wringing that happens where people glom onto the most visible sign of changing times and blame it for things that probably aren't as different as the adults think, but by the same token most schools in richer countries have screens everywhere with school-related interconnectivity and even tools that are not unlike social media.

I see very little downside here, even if it may not result in some magic rebirth of older forms of social interaction. It seems like the major benefit from the French pilot programs was "improved atmosphere," in which case it's still better than nothing. Having a period when kids are learning to deal with small-group dynamics is not a bad thing, and neither is taking "dealing with phone bullshit" off the teachers' plates.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 90 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

I mean... fine? France always does things kind of top-down and there's certainly no reason you have to have your phone readily available, and plenty of evidence it's good to be away from it.

It's not like they need to get to their phones to tell their parents there's an active shooter on campus. 😐

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Hey! The workers in the cell phone factory aren't that fat!

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago

I'm never gonna ~~financially~~ emotionally recover from this!

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed. Can we have this article taken off the internet? I don't want it accessible from any of my connections.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago

”hope that our relationship will only grow stronger in the coming years”

This hits different given the rhetoric of her husband and his (nominal) boss.

view more: next ›