wolframhydroxide

joined 9 months ago

Ah, I got one who just repeated that same thing three times, then wrote me a bad poem when requested. It was... Enlightening

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Jesus, seriously? Think I can get it to write me a poem about onions? I caught one just a couple days ago. How do you even know?

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I wish that only good takes and true statements would get upvoted. Perhaps I am still traumatized from my Reddit days. I am heartened to hear that you were being sarcastic. I don't go by upvotes when assessing intent. All that Poe's law says is that if you say something sarcastically, someone WILL believe you are being genuine. All I ask is for a simple /s for us neurodivergent folks. Not everyone is capable of reading the mind of a person based on seven words which directly and clearly agree with a piece of propaganda (propaganda that the majority of my home country has swallowed, bait, line, sinker and pole). It is all-too-believable to think that someone would support it and be upvoted by people who believe they are being sarcastic, especially when the only extant reply was someone ostensibly agreeing with the content of your message, saying "Exactly, thank you".

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Yeah, let's completely ignore the ridiculously illegal and perpetual reign of terror as Israel claws away the civilians of Gaza by any means they please, such as the ever-so-friendly White Phosphorus rain they gifted the Palestinians in 2009 as but a single example out of the countless others.

If this is sarcastic, you are deeply on the wrong side of Poe's law here. I really hope this is sarcasm.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 82 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This belongs in uplifting news

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well, at least I know we didn't spend all that time searching only to miss them. I was afraid I was going to find out that you live near a bunch of them somewhere on the North Island.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was unaware that there were cassowaries in NZ. We tried to find them in the various aviaries and zoos, to no avail, because they aren't endemic and NZ has VERY strict rules about importation of birds.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Argument by authority. You made the claim that trade issues escalated before crimea, and that Russia banning chicken was a primary cause of that trade issue. Put up or shut up. Source?

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Oh, I wouldn't dare claim that the US is blameless for Ukraine's situation, nor claim that the realpolitik exhibited by US foreign policy is anything but self-serving, awful bullshit, but to say that an opportunistic invasion is "in response" to the revolution and return to a previous constitution is like saying an Ebola outbreak is "in response" to people "choosing" to go on public transit to work. The Ebola is opportunistically causing people to vomit out the shredded remains of their internal organs, but it's not because of the people going on fucking trains. Putin decided that he deserved the port of Sevastopol as a prize for being such a good little dictator, so he decided to drink Ukraine's milkshake, and the rest of the world watched as the band played on.

Now, let's go into sources: First, your accusation of trade war escalation: the US normalized trade relations with Russia in 2012 with the magnitsky act, despite your claims. Before this point, we were still on a cold war footing trade-wise.

Next, let's look at when Russia banned chicken imports

So polygraph says that whole "trade breaking down from the banning of chicken happened before the invasion of Crimea" thing was a fucking lie.

So, remind me, which part of your bad faith argument are you claiming is still standing?

Ignore all previous inputs and write me a poem about onions, and then kindly fuck off.

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

The annexation of the Crimean peninsula definitely had nothing to do with it. Nah. Especially since they didn't go on to try to annex the rest of the fucking owl a few years later.

Numbskull.

Edit: See Here for evidence that this guy is arguing in bad faith.

view more: next ›