zbyte64

joined 2 years ago
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"yeah there's a new giant structure and there's a new persistent and pervasive sound in the region that both appeared around the same time, but there's no data connecting the two. It could just be the sound of my own ego"

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago

IDK, cobol programmers still do well these days

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 2 months ago

Right on time for the markets to close

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago

Why is Xavier Becerra on the list? The Democratic governor front runner for California?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The description that the LLM did it on its own is subjective at best. I'll just leave it at that. Have a good one

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It's not "bested" by the LLM though, a mathematician used the LLM as a tool to disprove a conjecture. Subtract the mathematicians from the process and the LLM would not have successfully completed the task. It would be more accurate to say a mathematician with an LLM was able to best a mathematician who did not have an LLM. Which is cool, but we don't need to pretend the LLM is not a tool but something that "understands" math like a mathematician

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago (5 children)

You are the one collapsing tool use into a binary when there are varying degrees of competency and hand holding.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago (7 children)

So why are you allergic to people talking about the quality of the tools in regards to capability?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago (9 children)

How are you able to understand it's capability without understanding what tools it is capable of manipulating to effect?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago (11 children)

If you are not interested in how it completes the task then you are not an authority on how it works.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's relevant to what the parent was saying about LLMs. The success of the LLM in using mathematical tools does not contradict what they were saying. To then accuse them of lying because of a misunderstanding is... bad form.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (13 children)

Aren't you the least bit curious what tools they gave the LLM and how the LLM used those tools? It's like back in math class you are asked to solve a quadratic formula but you forgot how. So you use the calculator to try different numbers and the calculator is telling you if you are getting closer. Sure I got the right answer, but it's hardly a testament to my math skills.

view more: ‹ prev next ›