And not embracing a diversity of tactics is leaving power at the table for the capitalists to take.
zbyte64
joined 2 years ago
No, it's not the same as copying and pasting the TODO into a prompt. Embedding the TODO in code instead of the prompt reduces tokens burned and increases accuracy because it's observing the TODO in context. Sure you can write more prompting to provide that context, but it still won't be as accurate. The less context you provide via prompting and instead provide more context through automatic deterministc feedback the better the results
Were you expecting me to recommend a show where they agree with you?
Are we expecting her to dismantle the master's house with the master's tools by throwing away the tools? My expectation is that she will use the tools to do harm reduction so that organizing lasting change becomes possible.
Examples to consider:
A code base with TODOs embedded will make fewer mistakes and spend less tokens than if you attempt to direct the LLM only with prompting.
A file system gives an LLM more context than a flat file (or large prompt) with the same contents because a file system has a tree like structure and makes it less likely the LLM will ingest context it doesn't need and confuse it
Lastly consider the efficacy of providing it tools vs using agent skills which is another form of prompting. Giving an LLM a deterministic feedback loop beats tweaking your prompts every time
In your opinion, Is AOC to the right of Reagan?
you should call the majority report, they would love to have you explain how you came to this conclusion: 646-257-3920 , you will have a much larger audience then what's here. I would love to see it.
Apologies for offering my understanding of what you said, I really don't understand your expectations here. That all politicians stop playing the game starting with AOC? And that will somehow bring down the two party system? But again, here we are talking about what is a better strategy which you insist is not the case.
If that was her intention then she wouldn't have stated Isreal should get no weapons, not even for "defense". Unless maybe she's trying to save the system from itself? Still seems like that shift is something beneficial for those who want the genocide to stop.
Even when you're a captive tax payer you can do things differently. I think you mean to say she has power to do things more effectively? which brings us back to debating the efficacy of her tactics
If you have some newly invented tactic I would love to hear it