this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
328 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

18803 readers
1137 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 97 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She described the U.S. Institute of Peace as "a bloated, useless entity that blew $50 million per year while delivering no peace."

"Now, the Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace, which is both beautifully and aptly named

Wow there's actually a sliver of truth in there. She's calling it a bloated, useless entity that wastes money and states that the addition of Trump's name to the organization is very apt.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

She described the U.S. Institute of Peace as “a bloated, useless entity that blew $50 million per year while delivering no peace.”

So, here's the thing about Trumpworld. The critiques themselves often aren't wrong.

The problem with Trumpworld is that you've got meatheads like Hegseth and Noem whining about how America's Gone Woke with mushy liberal institutions, when what they're complaining about is someone painting a rainbow flag on the side of a cruise missile.

The USIoP is practically sprouting from the hip of the IMF and World Bank, institutions notorious for their roles in global privatization of public commons, international arms dealing to US allies, and libertarian market-based propagandizing. They're outgrowths of American finance capital and heavily geared towards commoditizing foreign markets and prying them open for US banks and businesses to lay claim to the interior at deeply discounted rates.

The USIoP operates as a diplomatic core that can try and rationalize and institutionalize foreign occupation after the US has entered a region. And there's no better example of this than their role in authoring policy to pacify Iraqi resistance movements at the end of the Bush tenure.

A more objective observer might ask why we need Congress to continue to intercede in Iraqi politics five long years after we'd announced "Mission Accomplished" from the deck of a nearby aircraft carrier. But neoconservatives would sneeringly refute that Iraqis simply aren't ready to govern themselves and still need Americans to guide them towards a liberal democracy.

Obviously, Trumpworld disagrees. They think the solution to every foreign policy dispute is to murder dissidents en mass. And that's what we're seeing in Venezuela.

But USIoP hasn't done anything to keep us out of Venezuela. Or to expedite our exit from Iraq or Afghanistan. Or to prevent us from bombing Yemen or Iran. Or to avoid overthrowing the governments in Libya and Syria. Or to diffuse the conflict in Ukraine. Or to end the blockade and Israeli-induced famine in Gaza. So what role are they fulfilling?

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So what role are they fulfilling?

Well, right now, the role of fluffing up Donald Trump's ego with big silver letters at taxpayer expense.

I feel this a lot in this administration. The government actually is too big and it actually does need to be reigned in and seeing some (not all) of these institutions destroyed or crippled is actually gratifying for exactly the reasons you mention. I just wish it wasn't accompanied with a side of "here's some piss on your head, it must be raining." These idiot cosplaying shitheads are not the right tools for the job.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Silver? SILVER??? if it's not the tackiest gold he'll be insulted.

[–] moondoggie@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

No, they’re actually silver. The fact that they didn’t have the finest 1k gold coating was the only thing about all this that surprised me.