this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
813 points (99.6% liked)

World News

51300 readers
2646 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 159 points 1 day ago (10 children)

The real shock to Americans will be when they discover this can't be fixed.

Americans want to believe that relations will return to normal once the democrats are back in power. But, they don't understand that the loss of trust in the US is permanent. Sure, if the democrats take back power and want to negotiate trade deals, other countries may sign them. They're just not going to believe that the US can be trusted to honour the terms of those trade deals, and will structure the deals accordingly. Trump's 2 terms show that a treaty signed by the US is meaningless, because a president like Trump can come along and just rip it up. They've also showed that support for someone Trump-like is close enough to 50% that it can easily happen again.

The momentum of international trade, and the vast power the US wields means that there won't be a sudden cutting off of the US. But, bit by bit, even former staunch allies are going to start slowly pivoting away from the US whenever possible no matter who's elected and how big a landslide it is.

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 1 points 7 minutes ago

A lot of "always has been" in this thread but

a treaty signed by the US is meaningless

this is literally the USA's origin story lol

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 54 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Trump has ripped up or tried to cancel deals he made in his first term. Why any nation would bother to negotiate with the US right now is beyond me. Nothing can be trusted from this administration or any one to come

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Why any nation would bother to negotiate with the US right now is beyond me

It's because they don't really have a choice. If it were say, Australia, that had gone off the rails, they could just be ignored. But, the US is still such a central part of the world's economy, and there are so many important companies based out of the US, that it's not possible just to pull the plug. In addition, if countries didn't negotiate with Trump he might see it as a slight and send in the navy to interdict "drug boats" or something.

This also makes things look like they're better than they are. People see trade deals being negotiated and think "well, if that's happening, then things aren't that far gone. The reality is that countries used to negotiate trade deals with the US because, even when they felt they were being pressured to cave to US demands, they could at least count on the US to more-or-less honour the terms of the deal when it was done. I think countries are now dealing with the US because they have to, but they're really just going through the motions, not expecting that the result will actually be a binding agreement.

[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

About nations not having a choice there is truth to that but I want to focus on something nations can do to. Study in particular which companies support Trump the most and work to find replacements for those. For example the fossil fuel industry is a significant backer of Trump and Republicans. This means countries who are rightfully upset about Trump and buy fossil fuels from the US should make switching to renewable energy a huge priority maybe even do it at cost or subsidize the transition. This means fossil fuel companies will have less money and less to give to Republicans.

Also for people who live in blue states contact your state politicians and demand a faster transition to renewables too.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 19 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

Americans do not take the situation seriously. They either think they have no power to personally fix it, so contributing to any effort is pointless, or that it's just more of the same politics as before and can't tell the difference. They are encouraged to stay out of the way because they are the only force that seems to be capable of stopping it at this point.

Once Trump and the GOP destroy the framework of power the constitution defines, there are no rules anymore, only power, and the constitution really does mean nothing. The relationship America built with the world since WW1 will be over and won't return as democratic nations can not remain interdependent with a fascist America. America will be another authoritarian regime using violence as the solution to every problem, including domestic problems. Those problems will only increase because an authoritarian leadership is functionally incapable of managing a non-authoritarian system. America will transition, painfully and violently, to a fascist state and the dream that was America will be dead. All at the hands of a TV show personality and the generations raised by TV, which is both sad and painfully American.

Edit: Not enough Americans...

[–] BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I take it seriously and I encourage anyone to know they have the power to make a difference. If you can find who's encouraging people to stay out of the way please let everyone here know so we can fight against those people.

Also you're right if Trump stays in power longer it will be very grim not just for the people in the US but also for the entire world because look at how Trump is terrorizing other countries. Look at how he's basically a slave to Putin and abandoning Ukraine. Look at how he's grabbing people on the streets. If we don't fight this will get worse.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago

Maybe the US won't become fascist. Maybe the democrats will win in a landslide and reform things so that no rogue president can do what Trump did ever again.

But, even in that unlikely scenario, the trust the world had with the US has already been burned, and isn't coming back easily. It's obvious that other countries might try to avoid doing deals with a corrupt, fascist USA. But, what's less obvious is that thanks to Trump, countries also won't want to do deals with an apologetic, democratic, tolerant, liberal, honest USA. That USA can get voted out of office and replaced with a fascist in just one election cycle, and all the deals mean nothing when that happens.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

i mean, some of us legitimately have next to no power. or have good operational security.

me, i have 3,000 miles distance between me and krasnov at any given time and putting in a lisa novak style cannonball run would be sure to tip someone or something off. I'm going to leave it to someone closer.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 10 points 18 hours ago

This is the other problem with Americans. You think the next step after words is going in guns blazing. Your media is full of it, so it's no wonder you're brainwashed into believing it. It's why there are so many mass shootings. Someone disagrees with someone else and reaches for his gun.

That's not the next step. The next steps are to organize, protest, disrupt, disobey, obstruct. You can do all that from your own city.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

Just be a part of a group who are trying. That's it. Nobody needs to action hero a solution with a fist fight finale.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Good. Obviously it was wrong to trust the US this entire time. It’s time to dismantle the post-WW2 American dominance over the world, and move toward a more multilateral future. This process feels scary and might be quite difficult, but it’s important and it’s time. No one country should be considered the world’s policeman or supreme authority. I just hope that everyone shaking their head at the US realizes that they can only sit there doing that for so long, because the very next thing they need to urgently do is step the fuck up into that leadership vacuum before dictators do.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Will it really be a multilateral future though? Or will it be a Chinese future?

A multilateral future would be great, but multilateral alliances aren't very stable. Just look at how Orban is disrupting what the EU wants to do, even though Hungary is a relatively small and weak country in Europe. Or, look how toothless European regulations are when Ireland just refuses to enforce things like the GDPR, so the tech companies just declare themselves as Irish.

Meanwhile China seems very unified and their mixture of a command economy and a market economy has been very effective so far. I don't think the Chinese model is all bad. They've been massively effective at doing things like building high speed rail, developing and deploying solar panels, etc. OTOH, the Great Firewall and CCTV state is not how I would like to live.

Without the US, I don't know how well the rest of the world will be able to resist China. I think Australia might be the canary in the coal mine. I think China considers Australia to be in its sphere of influence and will try to put more and more pressure on it. Australia's outlook on the world is much more similar to Europe, but it's geographically really far away.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

“Multilateral” may include a very powerful China. The two are not mutually exclusive. China has been very prolific already in exerting its soft power around the world. They probably do stand to gain from the US losing standing. However I very much doubt that the US losing standing will immediately lead to total Chinese dominance around the globe. China has a lot to deal with, surviving its impending demographic apocalypse. There was a time we feared Japan in the same way: nonstop economy, strong culture, they bought a lot of American assets and real estate… soon they’ll take over the world! They’re still here, and very powerful, but the “big bad” fears were overblown. I think similarly, China wants its historic provinces back, and would like to exert the same kind of influence over Asia that it once did, and be a global trade power, but all of that put together is still far less than the imperialism which America has actually achieved and maintained around the world. So yeah, an ascendant China may be one feature of this future but I don’t see the problem with that. I don’t start from a position of hating and fearing China.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 45 minutes ago

the US losing standing will immediately lead to total Chinese dominance around the globe

The US didn't have total dominance around the globe either. They just had a lot of soft power, a lot more than any other country.

There was a time we feared Japan in the same way

Sure, but Japan was always relatively small. It was a country with a low population and few natural resources. China is a huge country with nearly 10% of the world's population and is one of the largest countries in the world. There are no guarantees that it will still be a major force in 10 or 20 years, but it's different from Japan which was a relatively small country that had a temporary niche in manufacturing certain kinds of goods.

The biggest issue with China is that they don't believe in the right to free speech and free expression. While the US has been more of an outlier in allowing unfettered free speech until recently, free speech and free expression is pretty central to European identity.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 20 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Absolutely. This regime has shown how fragile the relationship is, and how untrustworthy the USA is as a partner.

once the democrats are back in power

This little phrase reminded me: I find it interesting how this is just assumed by many people as an eventuality when we've already seen a failed coup attempt last time an election ousted the Republican regime. There is this underlying faith in the liberal democracy of the US, since despite its huge flaws, it hasn't failed in over a century. Similar with all the people who call for impeachment, police arresting ICE and other legal mechanisms.

It's silly to trust government institutions to save one from an openly, brazenly malicious government.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 11 points 22 hours ago

I find it interesting how this is just assumed by many people as an eventuality when we've already seen a failed coup attempt last time an election ousted the Republican regime.

Oh yeah, I think there's a solid chance that the democrats will never get back in power again. That, even if they win the popular vote by a massive margin, Trump will pull the developing country dictator trick and declare the results invalid and refuse to leave office. And that's assuming that people are even allowed to vote. What I was suggesting was the best possible outcome for people who still believe that this whole thing can be rescued. Even under those circumstances, I think you're going to see countries trying to pivot away from the US because the idea that the US can commit to anything that lasts more than maybe 2 years is obviously untrue.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

They’re just not going to believe that the US can be trusted

Yup. The damage to the American brand is permanent, and that will become painfully clear when the post-tariff trade deals take effect within the next year and a half and trade routes itself around the US rather than through it.

The worst part is it won't affect Donald in any meaningful way, because his perception of reality is wedded to his algorithm and his wealth makes him untouchable.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least in my circles, I think we're aware? People are looking real hard at ways to leave. We've also got a higher than usual chance of reforming/refurbishing some of those broken guard rails. Fingers crossed.

The folks supporting Trump, on the other hand, already believed that these relationships were dead and bad. They'll scapegoat somebody else for the decay; I do not see the avenue for this to be a learning experience.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm specifically talking about Americans thinking that the rest of the world will get over this. I think that trust has been broken.

Like you talk about broken guard rails. The US has been lecturing the world on how the US system of democracy is the best for decades now. There's always talk about how there's a system of checks and balances, and how US democracy can be messy, but in the end it's a system that works. I don't think anybody believes that anymore. The guard rails were always an illusion, and even if all of Trump's changes were rolled back, the rest of the world would know that the guard rails, and the checks and balances are all just an elaborate delusion.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

And I guess I'm specifically reporting on my circle of american's, who are both aware that we've burned a lot of goodwill and trust (though tbh, I'd hoped the trust was lost already after trump 1...).

The checks and balances held for Trump 1 relatively, and held for previous abuses before that (at least, sufficiently that folks would let the US say such things). I don't think it's obvious that they are irrepairable/irreplaceable: we could have a revolution and rebuild from scratch, as an extreme example. It is obvious that systems must change to do so; reorganizing the supreme court, changing campaign finance, etc. If they change, and how much, idk what to expect. But I think ~half the country knows it'll take serious reforms, and it still wont put the US back where it was. Trust != systems.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, trust has been burned and it's not coming back quickly. Maybe reform the systems and trust will eventually be built back. But, by that time the US won't be a major power anymore, so it won't matter as much.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Major power computations I think are harder. I agree the US is falling, but I don't think I've seen a serious analysis claiming that the US will become merely a power amongst a few dozen others anytime in the next few decades? We're about to become much poorer and less diplomatically influential, but still nukes, still the huge military spending, still capitalists with hands in other economies?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

that is what russia/putin achieved with KRASNOV. who do you think is the real backers of P2025 is,. the smart ones already fleeing a sinking ship that is US, scientists/ MD in specialities, but not for any degree lower than that

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At least in Europe most of our governments have made it amply clear that they would return to the status quo in a heartbeat. With some concessions, sure, and there's a lot of market related damage that they couldn't undo if they wanted to but the general sentiment seems to be that "we had a good thing going". Trump is entirely unpredictable as a partner but I don't see things as hopeless long term.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 15 hours ago

he has been predictable with putin, and the ME though, only with them.

[–] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I also get that perception, at least what they're showing outwards, but it's starting to feel like the EU is actually starting to plan for a future that has at least a much smaller dependence on the US.

I think for the pragmatic diplomats, it makes sense to show you're willing to go back to the old way of doing things because it might make the transition less painful, you get to keep at least some of the benefits and goodwill while you prepare to move away from them.

However, I also think there are unfortunately a lot of spineless (and greedy) people in power who would go back to, for example, a president Newsom in a heartbeat despite the risks it poses.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I think you can see the more open signs of shying away from American products, with Europe starting to officially adopt FOSS software like Linux or LibreOffice. That is a relatively easy change to make, since there is less physical logistics involved with the transition.

Material things, like shipments of manufactured goods for the F-35 program, would become evident in a decade or so, IMO.

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Once is a surpise. But twice?

No, EU leaders, the sensible ones at least, understand that the US cannot be relied upon anymore. It doesn't matter if Ds return to power. The US is bipolar. Unless they fundamentally change their electoral system, the chance of this happening again is basically 50/50.

EU is disentangling from the US, and rightly so.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's more than changing just the electoral system too. It's reforming the way that justices are chosen for the supreme court, and how long they serve. It's reforming the power the president's office has over entities like the department of justice. It's massive reforms over money in politics.

Basically, to have any chance for meaningful change, the US would have to undertake a system of massive constitutional amendments. And there hasn't been an amendment in more than 50 years... and that last one was a fairly benign change to the voting age.

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 4 points 22 hours ago

yes, indeed. basically, there's just no fucking way. America is loathed to admit it's wrong and change on a GOOD DAY.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 0 points 21 hours ago

This this THIS!! ^^^