Not The Onion

18955 readers

501 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

241

Panchen Lama says reincarnation must follow Chinese laws, be endorsed by Beijing (www.scmp.com)

submitted 6 days ago by FTonsilStones@programming.dev to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

88 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Second-highest figure in Tibetan Buddhism makes apparent reference to succession of exiled spiritual leader Dalai Lama

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know for how long they may have planned it. But I think it's likely that they would have created some sort of plans for an invasion of Taiwan, based on their statements where they say they don't rule out force to take over Taiwan. From this article:

Peng Qing'en, a spokesperson for China's Taiwan Affairs Office, told a regular news conference in Beijing that peaceful "reunification" under the "one country, two systems" model is the fundamental approach to "resolving the Taiwan issue".

"We are willing to create ample space for peaceful reunification and will spare no effort to pursue this prospect with the utmost sincerity," he said.

"However, we absolutely will not renounce the use of force and reserve the option to take all necessary measures."

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not renouncing the use of force is entirely different than exercising it, which they haven't. This would be like calling the US imperialist because it wouldn't accept the south from succeeding pre-civil war. How

China's top official in charge of Taiwan policy, the ruling Communist Party's fourth-ranked leader Wang Huning, did not mention force in a key policy speech on Saturday, which instead focused on how both sides would benefit from "reunification".

So they aren't even threatening it, just not ruling it out. Again, not very imperialistic.

[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't say they had exercised force, I said they're likely planning the use of force to take over Taiwan, whether the people of Taiwan want that or not. I would regard that as imperialistic. I think it would be more humane to respect the wishes of Taiwan - if they want to join the PRC then okay, but if they don't then perhaps that should be respected.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

How likely? Do you know what "we haven't ruled out x" means? How daft are you?

[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago

Well I can see things that are obviously true and you apparently can't, so I guess I'm not as daft as you