this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
120 points (97.6% liked)

Europe

8156 readers
985 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 73 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Danes will still be able to send letters, using the delivery company Dao, which already delivers letters in Denmark but will expand its services from 1 January from about 30m letters in 2025 to 80m next year. But customers will instead have to go to a Dao shop to post their letters – or pay extra to have it collected from home – and pay for postage either online or via an app.

The Danish postal service has been responsible for delivering letters in the country since 1624. In the last 25 years, letter-sending has been in sharp decline in Denmark, with a fall of more than 90%.

But evidence suggests a resurgence in letter-writing among younger people could be under way.

Dao said its research had found 18- to 34-year-olds send two to three times as many letters as other age groups, citing the trend researcher Mads Arlien-Søborg, who puts the rise down to young people “looking for a counterbalance to digital oversaturation”. Letter-writing, he said, had become a “conscious choice”.

According to Danish law, the option to send a letter must exist. This means that if Dao were to stop delivering letters, the government would be obliged to appoint somebody else to do it.

And then, right at the end:

Announcing their decision earlier this year, Kim Pedersen, the deputy chief executive of PostNord Denmark, said: “We have been the Danish postal service for 400 years, and therefore it is a difficult decision to tie the knot on that part of our history. The Danes have become more and more digital and this means there are very few letters left today, and the decline continues so significantly that the letter market is no longer profitable.”

The point of a postal system isn't to generate profit (although they totally can), it's to ensure the populace can send things securely without having to do it themselves. But... if the Danish postal system (or at least the bit that delivers letters) isn't profitable... why would a private company voluntarily take it over? They'll have to make it profitable, which means gutting either the services offered and raising prices, or gutting the company itself and selling off assets. I'm not sure if they'll be able to do the latter, so maybe some kind of government subsidy to ensure a profit? But then, why privatise at all?

It's hard to see this as anything but concerning, for the Danish people.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At some point, the relevance of the system becomes so low, and the cost so high, that it doesn't make sense to maintain. Imagine still maintaining horse feeding stations along the roads.

I agree, the point of post isn't to be profitable. But when it's no longer critical infrastructure, and the state can't maintain it without extensive losses, then we should privatise it. If the private sector can't maintain it with a profit, and it remains non-critical, we should shut it down.

[–] klangcola@reddthat.com 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not sure I buy the "not critical infrastructure" argument. Even if 95% of public (and private) correspondence is digital these days, paper-mail is still used as a fallback for some institutions and whenever a physical copy must be sent for whatever reason.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think 95% is right, but in any case, when does it then stop being critical infrastructure? At 99% digital correspondence? 100%? Never?

Must we maintain a working national postal service, with all its employees and logistics, just in case?

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

That is an easy question to answer. Sending letters becomes non-critical when it is cheaper to send the incidental letter as a package than it is to maintain the letter sending service.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Keep in mind that Denmark is a very digitalized society. Nearly everything is digital secure mail, like bills and information from the municipality or government. I'd say it's closer to 99.5% than 95%.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Are you willing to give up the pamphlet with all current discounts in the supermarkets nearby just because the government doesn't want to mail you anymore? Joking, but still: I'm sure mail is still required for a variety of reasons.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

pamphlet with all current discounts in the supermarkets nearb

I know you said you were joking but this is a terrible example as these have been digital and easily accessible via apps for a long time haha.

I'm struggling to think of cases where it is truly necessary. Obviously sometimes you get physical letters from banks to get new credit cards. But this is like, one letter every 5 years? Perhaps there's a few other things like that. But yea honestly I don't think the government has to be in charge of mail at that point as it is so underused.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

That is actually one of my main uses of mail, and I do really appreciate them.

Regarding important things, I live in a foreign country and when I have to vote for my government I get sent a letter, I vote and send back the letter. If the country I lived in removed mail I would not be able to vote in this way.