this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2026
978 points (98.6% liked)

World News

51824 readers
2652 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

They said it themselves, you can look it up, but here's a source

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

OP said “days before” - the reporting is “shortly before” with an unspecified timeline.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The exact timeline is not the point. The point is that the two most venerated American newspapers received information that the US was about to do something blatantly illegal and decided not to report this. But we've known for a long time that both of them (and all major media outlets in the US) are equivalent to state media anyway, so it's not surprising.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Sure if I had to bet, neither publication would report it in advance. But for the sake of argument: 2 days - plenty of time to spread the news cycle, form public debate, or debate in Congress. Government has to make a decision

30 minutes - troops in the air, if any US soldiers get killed and/or the mission fails perception will be that the blood is on the publication’s hands, along with calls for treason charges.

Again I doubt they’re reporting, but exact timeline does impact how I view their decision not to report.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

I see your point but still think you're choosing the most charitable interpretation. I choose not to be charitable to two news giants who have helped provide support and cover for starting multiple disastrous wars of aggression that killed countless people.