this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
1103 points (98.9% liked)

World News

51824 readers
2920 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Volkswagen will restore physical buttons to the dashboard in its latest compact car, part of a wider move away from touchscreens.

In a particularly retro touch, the new ID Polo will even have a volume dial.

For a decade or so, automakers rushed to replace knobs and switches with screens, Autoblog noted in October, but users largely disliked them: Controlling the air conditioning, for example, required delving through submenus while driving, which was both difficult and dangerous. Research found that using touchscreens took longer and distracted drivers.

Hyundai, Mercedes-Benz, Porsche, and VW have all announced plans to return to more tactile controls, and US and EU regulators announced last year that cars with touchscreen controls could get worse safety ratings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 80 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Touchscreens in cars was a terrible development. The natural haptic feedback of physical buttons is a must, while operating a vehicle.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 30 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Touchscreens are wonderful in a car, just not for basic functionality. You can pry my Android Auto out of my cold dead hands.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 14 points 4 days ago

The mini-map and cameras are nice on touchscreen too.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 8 points 3 days ago

Touchscreens are good for context-sensitive controls. They don't make sense for basic controls that should always be available.

I'm fortunate that I have a good touchscreen for use with Android Auto + physical buttons for things like HVAC and volume.

[–] albbi@piefed.ca 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You can have Android Auto without a touchscreen. My newish Mazda has joystick like controls for the screen.

[–] nbailey@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Mazda rotary dial is awesome. It does 90% of what a touchscreen does, and voice control or a passenger can do the rest. If it can’t be done with three or four clicks of the wheel or Siri, then pull over safely and use the phone.

My old car had an aftermarket touchscreen CarPlay headunit, and I much prefer the buttons and dials on the newer Mazda. Borrowing somebody else’s (usually newer) car with a touchscreen feels like a massive step backwards.

Sadly it looks like they’re also falling for the touchscreen b.s. on the ‘26 year vehicles, big L for safety.

[–] Juvyn00b@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah there is a lot of fuss about the cx5 turning to touchscreen and people hating it (in literature, not sure on the experience side yet). I have a 2020 and like the setup it has for sure.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Seems even more distracting than a touchscreen.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's not a joystick per se, it's a tilting knob, kind of like a 3D mouse. Older Benz models had the same setup, it's great.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Still requires you to stare at a screen while guiding a 3000lb slab of steel in public.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Up to a point. The rotation wheel has tactile feedback, it works really well in practice.

[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Then there's me who disables that every time I get into a work car with it. I'll just put my GPS in the cup holder, thanks.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Phone holders are wonderful in a car. Get rid of the built-in touch screens entirely.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Phone integration with the car is handy. Bigger screen + integrated controls. I have volume controls on my steering wheel and a button to issue voice commands to Android Auto.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A $200 tablet and $50 holder is much more capable than the built-in touch screen. The built in touch screen is adding more $2500 to the price of the vehicle.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The built in touch screen is adding more $2500 to the price of the vehicle.

Others will say that touch screens are replacing physical buttons to reduce cost. So which is it? Touch screens add big cost or touch screens reduce cost?

/Not aimed at you, since you didn't assert conflicting info

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

cost != price.

The costs involved with that touchscreen are in the tens of dollars, and much lower than the myriad physical hardware it replaces. The costs of producing the car are considerably lower. The price manufacturers charge for that vehicle are considerably higher.

Try to replace a defective touchscreen: the charge for the proprietary replacement screen is more than a flagship phone, but provides fewer capabilities than a budget tablet.

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I recently fixed a phantom/ghost problem in my GMC acadia by replacing the touch glass for about $100. It was easy peasy. Had I taken it to the dealership, I assume it would have been a $1000 repair as they would have replaced the whole head unit rather than just the warped glass.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm not going to speculate on the cost (or price) differential, but due to the requirement for backup cameras, screens have been required in cars for almost 10 years now (in the U.S. , no idea about other vehicle markets). However, these need not be touchscreens.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You can pry my Android Auto out of my cold dead hands.

Yes, that's the idea after your distracted driving caused fatal accident. Exactly!

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not like I can watch movies on the thing, bub. It's navigation and 99% of the time my audiobook player. Which, guess what, I control from my steering wheel. And it's an audiobook. What's there to be distracted by?

[–] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And it’s an audiobook. What’s there to be distracted by?

The audiobook? The answer was contained in your question. The result varied by type of drive though. They improve drivers during boring drives and well:

Overall, braking times to hazards were higher on the complex drive than the simple one, though the effects of secondary tasks such as audiobooks were especially deleterious on the complex drive.

I thought I saw another study some yesteryear about spacial reasoning tasks demanded by some audiobooks (describing a scene, what a building looks like, where it is etc) impaired spacial reasoning while driving. While music doesn't use spatial reasoning hardly at at all. That's why I stopped using audiobooks while driving, but I can't find it so maybe I've been lying to myself all along.

The takeaway: boring drives secondary tasks could be good. Complex drives secondary tasks could be bad. I'll stick with music but be more readily muting it for potentially interesting interactions. In a use the secondary task to keep focus and identify the hazard, once identified mute secondary task to react to the hazard.

But I play focus games while driving anyway. I don't indicate out of habit: I reason if there's someone to indicate to, then decide whether to indicate. I find it forces observations and space/speed reasoning to infer whether my changing direction presents a hazard to someone somewhere.