this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
111 points (97.4% liked)
Progressive Politics
3628 readers
1258 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Funny thing is the current system should have prevented him but, corruption.
The purpose of a system is what it does
No, the current system enabled him, because it doesn't take partisanship into account. The fabled checks and balances of the US constitution was created in a fantasy world where people of the same political party was meant to forget about that partisanship in favour of the plight of their office.
Actual realistic constitutions do not do that.
Isn't it like... the exact reason... the electoral college exists?
Like... "Hey dumb shit voters, we don't trust you to not be deceived by a conman populist piece of shit, so we're going to have an elector make the final call whether the one you voted for should actually be allowed to win."
Yes, but the electoral college has basically never functioned in that manner. People rightly argued that they should get what they vote for, thus electors in most states are legally bound to vote for the winning candidate.
There should be a role against winner take all. All of California doesn't vote Dem and all of Texas doesn't vote fascist. A proportional electoral college would have a more center left leaning.