this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
169 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55677 readers
3149 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump's desire to annex Greenland will not be thwarted and there could be meaningful U.S. action related to the Arctic island within "weeks or months," according to a senior administration official.

That's the view of Thomas Dans, Trump's Arctic commissioner. He's regarded as one of the main proponents of the president's interest in Greenland, an idea first brought to Trump by billionaire and former diplomat Ronald Lauder.

Dans has been working on the issue since 2020.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jontree255@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] optissima@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I think it was before Hegseth cleared house in fall; first few mobths they were floating it

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So everyone who said NO is no longer there?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, they are now on OUR side. MAGA hasn't figured out that whenever they fire a knowledgeable experienced operative, and replace them with a loyalist podcaster, they strengthen our side, and cripple theirs.

Do you honestly think that all those high ranking officers, who spent years navigating the landmines of military promotions until they got to very top, are going to allow these frat-boy putzes to just unceremoniously and humiliatingly kick them out, and they'll just fade into the sunset?

A few, maybe, but most are cut from that cloth. We haven't heard much from ex-presidents, ex-military officers, ex-intelligence officers, etc. I think its highly unlikely that they are all just sitting at home, screaming at the TV like the rest of us. We also aren't hearing much from foreign leaders, who clearly hate what is happening.

It is likely that at least some of them are in touch with each other, and with foreign leaders, and are forming a strategy to oppose MAGA if they are stupid enough to try to end elections and steal the government. They will have Red Lines that will trigger a response.

[–] jontree255@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Find it hard to believe that any current or former officer in the military is collaborating with another country. Even if it’s an “ally”.

Some general is not going to ask France or UK or Germany to “step in” if MAGA tries to steal elections and none of those countries want to.

There’s not going to be some secret sect of the military that’s going to save us when things keep getting worse. As far as we know the military had near 100% compliance committing war crimes by bombing those civilians in the Caribbean and kidnapping a foreign head of state.

I’ll be surprised if we’re not at war with NATO by end of this year over Greenland. It gives Trump every cover to do whatever the hell he wants.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

He NEEDS Greenland, in order to snuff Canada's EU-lifeline, when he enforces his annexation of Canada.

Greenland's a means, not the true goal: continental-kingdom is his goal.

& how's he going to justify the draft ( as a means of eradicating the "woke" ) if he hasn't got a war to fight?

Nobody understands, or accepts..

Trump's going to obliterate civilrights shortly, & his dictatorship will be warring on 3 fronts:

  • northward
  • civil war 2: confederate reverse-takeover & vengeance
  • southward, imperially rampaging Central & South America, the Carribean, etc..

& there's no longer anything that will prevent or stop this: sitting-on-hands-until-too-late is all that's being done.

So, Trump will do to Canada what Putin's been doing to Ukraina.

Then, of course, EU's isolated, & Putin, backed by China or BRICS, will "take care of them".

It's all dominoes, now.

1 month more, or something?

_ /\ _