this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
169 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55698 readers
2476 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump's desire to annex Greenland will not be thwarted and there could be meaningful U.S. action related to the Arctic island within "weeks or months," according to a senior administration official.

That's the view of Thomas Dans, Trump's Arctic commissioner. He's regarded as one of the main proponents of the president's interest in Greenland, an idea first brought to Trump by billionaire and former diplomat Ronald Lauder.

Dans has been working on the issue since 2020.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Why would any other country put its citizens in harms way when americans are not willing to save their own country?

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is the same logic that has allowed every major problem in history happen.

Fun fact, we all fucking share this planet and invisible bullshit nonsense lines on a map means nothing when a crazy man with a military starts storming across them.

If you arnt willing to stand up with your fellow man over fucking nationalism then when the asshole who's found a way to surpress those under him comes swinging you get to eat shit with the rest of us.

It's hardest to stand up from within if no one's willing to stand with you from without.

A problem in the US Is a problem for everyone, just as a problem in Russia is a problem for everyone. We stand up to bullies collectively or we all eat shit together.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Many of this administration’s actions affect people beyond the US.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm saying if the Untied States invades Greenland. Then Trump will be causing problems outside of the Untied States

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

This is a good time to point out that magafascism has already killed a million and more, through health policy and aid withdrawal… and how do we body-count the global promotion of fascism?

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

He's not suggesting other countries save our own country, he's suggesting they stand up for themselves and impose consequences on the regime in a way we haven't been willing to. And it wouldn't really take fighting. Dumping treasury bonds and ending use of the dollar in trade and as a reserve currency would be devastating. The US is 40 trillion in debt with a huge trade deficit. We're deeply vulnerable.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

I've read that the S.O.P. in such situations is for the country in question to simply default on all debt, then there is an accounting-adjustment, then the establishment moves-on, with some restructuring of who owns what, but it doesn't break countries to just decide they're not paying debts.

Especially when those countries are more central.

Sure, it might bankrupt many, but .. who cares? Money doesn't.

_ /\ _

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 months ago

Why aren't other countries putting economic sanctions on America? Why aren't other countries boycotting the upcoming World Cup or Olympics?

We're expected to voluntarily destroy our nation for their entertainment, but they won't even give up a soccer tournament.